This site usescookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Spinal epidural lipomatosis in a pediatric patient with a malignant brain tumor: illustrative case

Reed Berlet Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Chicago, Illinois; and

寻找其他论文里德误码率let in
Current site
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MSc
,
Daphne Li Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Chicago, Illinois

Search for other papers by Daphne Li in
Current site
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
, and
John Ruge Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Chicago, Illinois

Search for other papers by John Ruge in
Current site
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
Open access

BACKGROUND

Spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) in pediatric patients with concomitant malignant brain neoplasms is rare and can present with rapid deterioration in neurological function.

OBSERVATIONS

A 4-year-old boy with SEL became paraplegic 4 months after completion of chemoradiation for his previously resected, intracranial atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor. The patient presented with rapid deterioration in lower extremity sensory and motor function, which, given his oncological history, was concerning for disease progression. Of note, 8 months prior, the patient was started on corticosteroid therapy for respiratory dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed significant progression of lumbosacral SEL requiring surgical decompression with subsequent neurological improvement.

LESSONS

When evaluating pediatric patients with primary or metastatic brain tumors with new or worsening myelopathy and motor or sensory deficits, it is important to consider SEL.

ABBREVIATIONS

ATRT = atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor ; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging ; SEL = spinal epidural lipomatosis

BACKGROUND

Spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL) in pediatric patients with concomitant malignant brain neoplasms is rare and can present with rapid deterioration in neurological function.

OBSERVATIONS

A 4-year-old boy with SEL became paraplegic 4 months after completion of chemoradiation for his previously resected, intracranial atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor. The patient presented with rapid deterioration in lower extremity sensory and motor function, which, given his oncological history, was concerning for disease progression. Of note, 8 months prior, the patient was started on corticosteroid therapy for respiratory dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed significant progression of lumbosacral SEL requiring surgical decompression with subsequent neurological improvement.

LESSONS

When evaluating pediatric patients with primary or metastatic brain tumors with new or worsening myelopathy and motor or sensory deficits, it is important to consider SEL.

ABBREVIATIONS

ATRT = atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor ; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging ; SEL = spinal epidural lipomatosis

Neurological deterioration after treatment for a brain tumor can be caused by various factors, such as tumor recurrence, progression, or metastases. Other pathology, such as spinal epidural lipomatosis (SEL), which can present similarly to neoplasms by causing neurological deficits secondary to mass effect, may pose a challenge for rapid identification. SEL is usually a benign disorder that is characterized by an accumulation of unencapsulated adipose tissue in the epidural space.1It is more commonly found in obese patients, those with chronic steroid exposure, as postsurgical changes, or for idiopathic reasons. In rare cases, it may cause compression of the spinal cord, causing symptoms of myelopathy or radiculopathy. This phenomenon has been well documented in adults, but there are limited reported cases in the pediatric population.2Here we present a case of progressive SEL in a pediatric patient recently treated for a malignant tumor of the brain, causing progressive paraparesis.

Illustrative Case

A 4-year-old White male with Phalen-McDermid syndrome and a history of a right frontal craniotomy for resection of an atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) presented to the emergency room with 2 weeks of progressive paraparesis (Table 1). Prior to this admission, he had had some baseline developmental delay but was independently ambulatory and playful. On presentation, he appeared cushingoid, awake and alert, and able to move both arms equally with good strength, but with significant weakness of his lower extremities—unable to stand, 2–3/5 strength throughout—and absent lower extremity reflexes. There was no change in bowel or bladder function.

TABLE 1.

Cases of SEL in pediatric patients with a history of brain tumors.

Authors & Year Sex/Age (yrs) Neuro-oncological Hx Signs & Symptoms Onset* Steroid Dosage Indication for Steroids SEL Dx Since Starting Steroids (mos) Extent of Lipomatosis Management Length of FU
Quint et al., 19883 M/11 Pineoblastoma s/p resection 1 yr prior LE weakness, paresthesias at T2–3 sensory level, bowel/bladder deficit 1 yr 20 mg/day corticosteroid NS 12 T3–9 Thoracic laminectomies for resection of SEL Worsening of symptoms w/ findings of disseminated disease (immediately postoperative)
Present case M/4 Rt frontal ATRT s/p resection 8 mos prior, & chemoradiation LE weakness, marked paraparesis, unable to walk 7 mos 0.1–0.5 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone, 15 mg/day total on admission Respiratory failure, intrinsic pulmonary disease 8 L1–5 L1–5 laminoplasty for resection of SEL, steroid wean Mild residual weakness & ataxia present, able to walk unassisted (4 mos)

Dx = diagnosis; FU = follow-up; Hx = history; LE = lower extremity; NS = not specified; s/p = status post.

Onset of symptoms after beginning steroid therapy.

Given his oncological history, there was concern for possible tumor recurrence or progression. Gross-total resection of his ATRT, 14 months earlier, was followed by chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation and craniospinal proton beam therapy. His course of radiation therapy (54 Gy) was completed 4 months prior to his presentation. There was no evidence of residual tumor or recurrence on recent postoperative surveillance magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Fig. 1).

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Preoperative and serial postoperative axial T1-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) postcontrast (left) and T2-weighted noncontrast (right) MRI of the brain.A:Preoperative MRI demonstrating a heterogeneously enhancing, T2-hyperintense right frontal paramedian lesion.B:Postoperative MRI demonstrating gross-total resection of the lesion.C:MRI of the patient’s brain on presentation, 13 months postoperatively, without evidence of recurrent lesion.

MRI of his brain and spine, obtained on presentation to the emergency room, confirmed no evidence of tumor progression or recurrence (Fig. 1C) but did demonstrate extensive lumbosacral SEL that had progressed over the last 8 months (Fig. 2). He was taken to surgery for L1 to L5 laminoplasty and decompression of his spinal cord and cauda equina via ultrasound aspiration of his SEL (Fig. 3). The patient demonstrated immediate improvements in strength postoperatively and was discharged to an acute inpatient rehabilitation center. Follow-up at 4 months postoperatively demonstrates expected postoperative changes (Fig. 3D)和神经系统进行持续改进:他是佤邦lking short distances independently with only mild persistent imbalance. A steroid wean was initiated shortly after diagnosis of symptomatic SEL and the patient was successfully weaned off of all steroids after 3 months without any deterioration of respiratory function.

FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Sagittal T1-weighted noncontrast MRI of the lumbar spine showing the progression of SEL in a 4-year-old boy on chronic steroids. Postoperative changes from a prior L5 laminotomy for release of a tethered cord and fatty filum resection are seen. Lumbar MRI performed 7 months prior (A), 3 months prior (B), and on the day of presentation (C). Note the progressive increasing volume of SEL both ventral and dorsal to the thecal sac, causing significant stenosis of the spinal canal.

FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Intraoperative photographs and postoperative imaging.A:L1–5 laminotomies were performed bilaterally. The laminae were detached caudally at L5–S1 and retracted rostrally, exposing the extensive SEL.B:Post-ultrasound aspiration of the adipose tissue showing the underlying dura.C:Replacement and reattachment of the laminoplasty segment via interrupted sutures to adjoining interlaminar lateral ligaments.D:Postoperative T1-weighted noncontrast MRI of the lumbar spine at 3 months postoperatively demonstrating expected postsurgical changes and resection of the patient’s extensive SEL.

Discussion

Literature Review

A PubMed search through October 2022 was conducted using the search terms “(pediatric OR infant OR child) AND (spinal OR epidural) AND (lipomatosis)” (Fig. 4). Papers were included only if full-text articles were available in English and described pediatric patients (age ≤21 years who had SEL with a past or current brain tumor.

FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

PRISMA flowchart of citations identified and evaluated. Format provided by Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement.PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

One paper by Quint et al.3met the criteria (Table 1). The paper reported on an 11-year-old male patient with a pineoblastoma treated with 20 mg/day of corticosteroids for 1 year who was diagnosed with symptomatic thoracic SEL requiring surgical intervention.

Observations

In children, SEL is most common in the thoracic region but can also present in the lumbosacral and rarely the cervical region.4Long-term corticosteroid treatment has been implicated in the development of SEL in adults and pediatric patients. Other associated disorders include, but are not limited to, Cushing’s syndrome, obesity, and Scheuermann kyphosis.15Nonverbal pediatric patients may pose a particular challenge for identifying SEL because a common early complaint is back pain.6Once the severity of fat accumulation is enough to compress the spinal cord, symptoms such as weakness, numbness, urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and cauda equina syndrome can occur depending on the spinal region.14The diagnostic and most sensitive test is a T1-weighted MRI; however, computed tomography can be diagnostic as well.7Treatment varies based on etiology. Conservative measures usually include weaning of steroid use and replacement with more targeted therapies for existing disorders.4Other conservative treatments for noniatrogenic etiologies include weight reduction, dietary modification, and correction of endocrine dysfunction.1,2,4,6Based on the provider’s discretion and severity of symptoms, surgical decompression may be considered.7

We describe a case of SEL in a developmentally delayed 4-year-old male with a history of a brain tumor who presented with lower extremity weakness and irritability (Table 1). Having completed chemoradiation therapy for his brain tumor 4 months prior, our patient’s irritability and difficulty walking could have been secondary to tumor recurrence or metastatic spread. Other conditions, such as iatrogenic Cushing’s syndrome due to his chronic steroid use, can cause symptoms such as muscle weakness, depression, anxiety, irritability, and cognitive difficulties.8此外,我们的病人基线张力减退nd developmental delay due to his chromosomal deletion syndrome. The combination of his comorbidities could easily distract clinicians from SEL as the primary diagnosis.

Quint et al.3presented another unique case of symptomatic SEL in a young male with a history of pineoblastoma (Table 1), the only other reported case of this nature in the literature. Initial MRI evaluation led to his diagnosis of symptomatic thoracic SEL. However, this patient did not improve after decompressive surgery and actually experienced worsening of symptoms. Subsequent myelography and cytological examination of cerebral spinal fluid diagnosed extensive seeding of his thecal sac with metastatic disease. This case is unique in that it highlights how SEL and tumor can mimic each other and, unfortunately, even coexist.

In conclusion, SEL can be an uncommon cause of neurological decline and should be considered in the differential diagnosis when assessing neuro-oncological patients with an acute decline in function.

Lessons

Limitations of this paper include the retrospective nature and small sample size. However, this is reflected in the paucity of available literature on this clinical scenario. As such, we aim to highlight this rare, but potentially surgical, pathology. Careful examination of radiographic imaging and review of patient comorbidities and medical history is always required in evaluating a patient with new neurological deficits. Recurrence or progression of central nervous system tumors is often at the forefront of the differential diagnosis when considering neurological deterioration in patients with a history of central nervous system tumors. However, neurological decline due to symptomatic SEL in pediatric patients treated with steroids should be considered in the differential.

Disclosures

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Author Contributions

Conception and design: Ruge. Acquisition of data: Berlet, Li. Analysis and interpretation of data: all authors. Drafting of the article: all authors. Critically revising the article: all authors. Reviewed submitted version of the manuscript: all authors. Approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors: Ruge. Administrative/technical/material support: Ruge.

References

  • 1

    PapastefanST,BhimaniAD,DenyerS,et al.Management of idiopathic spinal epidural lipomatosis: a case report and review of the literature.Childs Nerv Syst.2018;34(4):757763.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    AlomariS,LubelskiD,KhalifehJM,et al.Etiologies and outcomes of spinal epidural lipomatosis: systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of reported cases.Clin Spine Surg.2022;35(9):383387.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    QuintDJ,BoulosRS,SandersWP,MehtaBA,PatelSC,TielRL.Epidural lipomatosis.Radiology.1988;169(2):485490.

  • 4

    MöllerJC,CronRQ,YoungDW,et al.类固醇诱导性脊髓硬膜外lipomatosisin the pediatric age group: report of a new case and updated analysis of the literature.Pediatr Rheumatol Online J.2011;9(1):5.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    ZhangZ,LiuZ,ZhuZ,QiuY.Spinal epidural lipomatosis—an easily ignored secondary intraspinal disorder in spinal kyphotic deformities.BMC Musculoskelet Disord.2017;18(1):112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    MöllerJ,GirschickHJ,HahnG,PesslerF.[Steroid-induced spinal epidural lipomatosis in pediatric patients].Z Rheumatol.2010;69(5):447449.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    FerlicPW,MannionAF,JeszenszkyD,et al.Patient-reported outcome of surgical treatment for lumbar spinal epidural lipomatosis.Spine J.2016;16(11):13331341.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    KochCA,DoppmanJL,PatronasNJ,NiemanLK,ChrousosGP.Do glucocorticoids cause spinal epidural lipomatosis? When endocrinology and spinal surgery meet.Trends Endocrinol Metab.2000;11(3):8690.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • \n

    Preoperative and serial postoperative axial T1-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) postcontrast (left<\/em>) and T2-weighted noncontrast (right<\/em>) MRI of the brain. A:<\/strong> Preoperative MRI demonstrating a heterogeneously enhancing, T2-hyperintense right frontal paramedian lesion. B:<\/strong> Postoperative MRI demonstrating gross-total resection of the lesion. C:<\/strong> MRI of the patient\u2019s brain on presentation, 13 months postoperatively, without evidence of recurrent lesion.<\/p><\/caption>"}]}" aria-selected="false" role="option" data-menu-item="list-id-0cd14032-81fc-46f4-90a9-72c8ebd70d1c" class="ListItem ListItem--disableGutters ListItem--divider">

    FIG. 1.
    View in gallery
    FIG. 1.

    Preoperative and serial postoperative axial T1-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) postcontrast (left) and T2-weighted noncontrast (right) MRI of the brain.A:Preoperative MRI demonstrating a heterogeneously enhancing, T2-hyperintense right frontal paramedian lesion.B:Postoperative MRI demonstrating gross-total resection of the lesion.C:MRI of the patient’s brain on presentation, 13 months postoperatively, without evidence of recurrent lesion.

  • \n

    Sagittal T1-weighted noncontrast MRI of the lumbar spine showing the progression of SEL in a 4-year-old boy on chronic steroids. Postoperative changes from a prior L5 laminotomy for release of a tethered cord and fatty filum resection are seen. Lumbar MRI performed 7 months prior (A<\/strong>), 3 months prior (B<\/strong>), and on the day of presentation (C<\/strong>). Note the progressive increasing volume of SEL both ventral and dorsal to the thecal sac, causing significant stenosis of the spinal canal.<\/p><\/caption>"}]}" aria-selected="false" role="option" data-menu-item="list-id-0cd14032-81fc-46f4-90a9-72c8ebd70d1c" class="ListItem ListItem--disableGutters ListItem--divider">

    FIG. 2.
    View in gallery
    FIG. 2.

    Sagittal T1-weighted noncontrast MRI of the lumbar spine showing the progression of SEL in a 4-year-old boy on chronic steroids. Postoperative changes from a prior L5 laminotomy for release of a tethered cord and fatty filum resection are seen. Lumbar MRI performed 7 months prior (A), 3 months prior (B), and on the day of presentation (C). Note the progressive increasing volume of SEL both ventral and dorsal to the thecal sac, causing significant stenosis of the spinal canal.

  • \n

    Intraoperative photographs and postoperative imaging. A:<\/strong> L1\u20135 laminotomies were performed bilaterally. The laminae were detached caudally at L5\u2013S1 and retracted rostrally, exposing the extensive SEL. B:<\/strong> Post-ultrasound aspiration of the adipose tissue showing the underlying dura. C:<\/strong> Replacement and reattachment of the laminoplasty segment via interrupted sutures to adjoining interlaminar lateral ligaments. D:<\/strong> Postoperative T1-weighted noncontrast MRI of the lumbar spine at 3 months postoperatively demonstrating expected postsurgical changes and resection of the patient\u2019s extensive SEL.<\/p><\/caption>"}]}" aria-selected="false" role="option" data-menu-item="list-id-0cd14032-81fc-46f4-90a9-72c8ebd70d1c" class="ListItem ListItem--disableGutters ListItem--divider">

    FIG. 3.
    View in gallery
    FIG. 3.

    Intraoperative photographs and postoperative imaging.A:L1–5 laminotomies were performed bilaterally. The laminae were detached caudally at L5–S1 and retracted rostrally, exposing the extensive SEL.B:Post-ultrasound aspiration of the adipose tissue showing the underlying dura.C:Replacement and reattachment of the laminoplasty segment via interrupted sutures to adjoining interlaminar lateral ligaments.D:Postoperative T1-weighted noncontrast MRI of the lumbar spine at 3 months postoperatively demonstrating expected postsurgical changes and resection of the patient’s extensive SEL.

  • \n

    PRISMA flowchart of citations identified and evaluated. Format provided by Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med<\/em>. 2009;6(7):e1000097.<\/p><\/caption>"}]}" aria-selected="false" role="option" data-menu-item="list-id-0cd14032-81fc-46f4-90a9-72c8ebd70d1c" class="ListItem ListItem--disableGutters ListItem--divider">

    FIG. 4.
    View in gallery
    FIG. 4.

    PRISMA flowchart of citations identified and evaluated. Format provided by Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement.PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

  • 1

    PapastefanST,BhimaniAD,DenyerS,et al.Management of idiopathic spinal epidural lipomatosis: a case report and review of the literature.Childs Nerv Syst.2018;34(4):757763.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    AlomariS,LubelskiD,KhalifehJM,et al.Etiologies and outcomes of spinal epidural lipomatosis: systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of reported cases.Clin Spine Surg.2022;35(9):383387.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    QuintDJ,BoulosRS,SandersWP,MehtaBA,PatelSC,TielRL.Epidural lipomatosis.Radiology.1988;169(2):485490.

  • 4

    MöllerJC,CronRQ,YoungDW,et al.类固醇诱导性脊髓硬膜外lipomatosisin the pediatric age group: report of a new case and updated analysis of the literature.Pediatr Rheumatol Online J.2011;9(1):5.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    ZhangZ,LiuZ,ZhuZ,QiuY.Spinal epidural lipomatosis—an easily ignored secondary intraspinal disorder in spinal kyphotic deformities.BMC Musculoskelet Disord.2017;18(1):112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    MöllerJ,GirschickHJ,HahnG,PesslerF.[Steroid-induced spinal epidural lipomatosis in pediatric patients].Z Rheumatol.2010;69(5):447449.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    FerlicPW,MannionAF,JeszenszkyD,et al.Patient-reported outcome of surgical treatment for lumbar spinal epidural lipomatosis.Spine J.2016;16(11):13331341.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    KochCA,DoppmanJL,PatronasNJ,NiemanLK,ChrousosGP.Do glucocorticoids cause spinal epidural lipomatosis? When endocrinology and spinal surgery meet.Trends Endocrinol Metab.2000;11(3):8690.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 157 157 157
PDF Downloads 114 114 114
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
Baidu
map