This site usescookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Search Results

You are looking at1-2of2items for

  • Author or Editor: Shervin Mirshahix
  • Refine by Access: allx
Clear All Modify Search
Open access

Erik F. Hauck, Jeremy A. Yarden, Lily I. Hauck, Joseph M. Bibawy, Shervin Mirshahi, and Gerald A. Grant

BACKGROUND

Vein of Galen malformations (VoGMs) in newborns often represent life-threatening emergencies. Outcome is difficult to predict. The authors review 50 VoGM cases to correlate anatomical types with treatment and outcome.

OBSERVATIONS

Four distinct types of VoGMs are identified: mural simple (type I), mural complex (type II), choroidal (type III), and choroidal with deep venous drainage (type IV). Seven patients presented with mural simple VoGMs with a “single hole” fistula supplied by only one large feeder. These patients were treated electively at >6 months; development was normal. Fifteen patients presented with complex mural VoGMs. Multiple large feeders joined a single fistulous point within the wall of the varix. Patients typically presented with congestive heart failure (CHF) and required emergent transarterial intervention. Mortality was 7.7% with less than two-thirds developing normally. Twenty-five patients presented with choroidal VoGMs. Multiple large arterial feeders joined at multiple fistulous sites. Severe CHF in most patients required emergent transarterial and sometimes transvenous intervention. Mortality was 9.5%; two-thirds of the patients had a normal development. Three babies presented with choroidal VoGMs with deep intraventricular venous drainage. This phenomenon caused fatal “melting brain syndrome” in all three patients.

LESSONS

Recognition of the specific VoGM type determines treatment options and sets outcome expectations.

Restricted access

何塞·达尼洛Bengzon Diestro Mahmoud diba,尼姆Adeeb, Robert W. Regenhardt, Justin E. Vranic, Adrien Guenego, Sovann V. Lay, Leonardo Renieri, Ali Al Balushi, Eimad Shotar, Kévin Premat, Kareem El Namaani, Guillaume Saliou, Markus A. Möhlenbruch, Ivan Lylyk, Paul M. Foreman, Jay A. Vachhani, Vedran Župančić, Muhammad U. Hafeez, Caleb Rutledge, Hamid Rai, Vincent M. Tutino, Shervin Mirshahi, Sherief Ghozy, Pablo Harker, Naif M. Alotaibi, James D. Rabinov, Yifan Ren, Clemens M. Schirmer, Oded Goren, Mariangela Piano, Anna L. Kühn, Caterina Michelozzi, Stéphanie Elens, Robert M. Starke, Ameer E. Hassan, Arsalaan Salehani, Anh Nguyen, Jesse Jones, Marios Psychogios, Julian Spears, Thomas Marotta, Vitor Pereira, Carmen Parra-Fariñas, Maria Bres-Bullrich, Michael Mayich, Mohamed M. Salem, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Brian T. Jankowitz, Ricardo A. Domingo, Thien Huynh, Rabih Tawk, Christian Ulfert, Boris Lubicz, Pietro Panni, Ajit S. Puri, Guglielmo Pero, Christoph J. Griessenauer, Hamed Asadi, Adnan Siddiqui, Andrew F. Ducruet, Felipe C. Albuquerque, Nirav Patel, Peter Kan, Vladimir Kalousek, Pedro Lylyk, Srikanth Boddu, Christopher J. Stapleton, Jared Knopman, Pascal Jabbour, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris, Frédéric Clarençon, Nicola Limbucci, Mohammad A. Aziz-Sultan, Hugo H. Cuellar-Saenz, Christophe Cognard, Aman B. Patel, and Adam A. Dmytriw

OBJECTIVE

The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is an intrasaccular flow disruptor designed for wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. These aneurysms may require the use of a concomitant stent. The objective of this study was to determine the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing stent-assisted WEB treatment. In addition, the authors also sought to determine the predictors of a concomitant stent in aneurysms treated with the WEB device.

开云体育世界杯赔率

本研究的数据来自WorldWideWEB Consortium, an international multicenter cohort including patients treated with the WEB device. Aneurysms were classified into two groups based on treatment: stent-assisted WEB and WEB device alone. The authors compared clinical and radiological outcomes of both groups. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine factors that predispose to stent use.

RESULTS

The study included 691 intracranial aneurysms (31 with stents and 660 without stents) treated with the WEB device. The adequate occlusion status did not differ between the two groups at the latest follow-up (83.3% vs 85.6%, p = 0.915). Patients who underwent stenting had more thromboembolic (32.3% vs 6.5%, p < 0.001) and procedural (16.1% vs 3.0%, p < 0.001) complications. Aneurysms treated with a concomitant stent had wider necks, greater heights, and lower dome-to-neck ratios. Increasing neck size was the only significant predictor for stent use.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that there is no difference in the degree of aneurysm occlusion between the two groups; however, complications were more frequent in the stent group. In addition, a wider aneurysm neck predisposes to stent assistance in WEB-treated aneurysms.

Baidu
map