This site usescookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Search Results

You are looking at1-2of2items for

  • Author or Editor: Andrew Plattx
  • Refine by Access: allx
Clear All Modify Search
Restricted access

Anoushka Singh, H. Alan Crockard, Andrew Platts, and John Stevens

Object.The aim of this study was to determine if radiological features could be used to predict outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

Methods.The authors studied 69 patients consecutively referred to The National Hospital, Queen Square, for decompressive surgery. Data obtained from preoperative cervical spine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies were each analyzed on two separate occasions by two blinded radiologists. The parameters determined were signal change and the presence and severity of compression. Clinical outcome was determined by pre- and postoperative timed walks, as well as by evaluation of myelopathy disability index scores, Ranawat classification, and Nurick grades.

There was good inter- and intraobserver reliability for determination of radiological data. A significant relationship was found between MR imaging signal change and surgery-related outcome, as reflected by improvement in walking parameters; however, this was confounded by the fact that signal change also related to preoperative walking parameters, and those patients for whom preoperative walking function was worse experienced greater functional improvement in walking postoperatively. The relationships between ambulatory-related data and severity or extent of spinal cord compression were less marked.

Conclusions.Cervical cord compression and intrinsic MR imaging signal change correlate with clinical severity, and, in this population, the presence of signal change was correlated with better surgery-related outcome. However, confounding factors and the lack of strong correlation indicate that these radiological measurements are insufficient to be used as a reliable tool for predicting surgery-related benefits in individual patients.

Free access

Murray Echt, Adewale A. Bakare, Jesus R. Varela, Andrew Platt, Mohammed Abdul Sami, Joseph Molenda, Mena Kerolus, and Richard G. Fessler

OBJECTIVE

Patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and neurogenic pain may be candidates for decompression alone or short-segment fusion. In this study, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) decompression (MIS-D) and MIS short-segment fusion (MIS-SF) in patients with DLS were compared in a propensity score–matched analysis.

开云体育世界杯赔率

倾向分数计算使用13杂物bles: sex, age, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, smoking status, leg pain, back pain, grade 1 spondylolisthesis, lateral spondylolisthesis, multilevel spondylolisthesis, lumbar Cobb angle, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, and pelvic tilt in a logistic regression model. One-to-one matching was performed to compare perioperative morbidity and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for patients was calculated based on cutoffs of percentage change from baseline: 42.4% for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 25.0% for visual analog scale (VAS) low-back pain, and 55.6% for VAS leg pain.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients were included in the propensity score calculation, resulting in 31 matched pairs. Perioperative morbidity was significantly reduced for the MIS-D group, including shorter operative duration (91 vs 204 minutes, p < 0.0001), decreased blood loss (22 vs 116 mL, p = 0.0005), and reduced length of stay (2.6 vs 5.1 days, p = 0.0004). Discharge status (home vs rehabilitation), complications, and reoperation rates were similar. Preoperative PROMs were similar, but after 3 months, improvement was significantly higher for the MIS-SF group in the VAS back pain score (−3.4 vs −1.2, p = 0.044) and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) score (+10.3 vs +1.9, p = 0.009), and after 1 year the MIS-SF group continued to have significantly greater improvement in the VAS back pain score (−3.9 vs −1.2, p = 0.026), ODI score (−23.1 vs −7.4, p = 0.037), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey MCS score (+6.5 vs −6.5, p = 0.0374), and VR-12 MCS score (+7.6 vs −5.1, p = 0.047). MCID did not differ significantly between the matched groups for VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, or ODI scores (p = 0.38, 0.055, and 0.072, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

DLS手术患者有如果milar rates of significant improvement after both MIS-D and MIS-SF. For matched patients, tradeoffs were seen for reduced perioperative morbidity for MIS-D versus greater magnitudes of improvement in back pain, disability, and mental health for patients 1 year after MIS-SF. However, rates of MCID were similar, and the small sample size among the matched patients may be subject to patient outliers, limiting generalizability of these results.

Baidu
map