This site usescookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Filter

Refine by Publication

Refine by Date
—

Refine by Access

Refine By Subjects

  • Print
  • Save

Search Results

You are looking at1-6of6items for

  • Author or Editor: Cathleen C. Kuox
  • Refine by Access: allx
Clear All Modify Search
Open access

Robotics planning in minimally invasive surgery for adult degenerative scoliosis: illustrative case

Zach Pennington, Nolan J. Brown, Saif Quadri, Seyedamirhossein Pishva, Cathleen C. Kuo, and Martin H. Pham

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgical techniques are changing the landscape in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, enabling surgical correction to be achievable in increasingly medically complex patients. Spinal robotics are one technology that have helped facilitate this. Here the authors present an illustrative case of the utility of robotics planning workflow for minimally invasive correction of ASD.

OBSERVATIONS

A 60-year-old female presented with persistent and debilitating low back and leg pain limiting her function and quality of life. Standing scoliosis radiographs demonstrated adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS), with a lumbar scoliosis of 53°, a pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch of 44°, and pelvic tilt of 39°. Robotics planning software was utilized for preoperative planning of the multiple rod and 4-point pelvic fixation in the posterior construct.

LESSONS

To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first report detailing the use of spinal robotics for complex 11-level minimally invasive correction of ADS. Although additional experiences adapting spinal robotics to complex spinal deformities are necessary, the present case represents a proof-of-concept demonstrating the feasibility of applying this technology to minimally invasive correction of ASD.

In开云手机版app下载安装最新版Neurosurg杂志ery: Case Lessons Volume 5 (2023): Issue 10 (Mar 2023)

Restricted access

Radiotherapy after gross-total resection and subtotal resection of spinal chordoma: a SEER database analysis of overall survival outcomes

Julian Gendreau, Cathleen C. Kuo, Yusuf Mehkri, Sachiv Chakravarti, Brian Lu, Daniel Lubelski, Kristin J. Redmond, Chetan Bettegowda, and Debraj Mukherjee

OBJECTIVE

Chordomas are most frequently found in the sacrum, vertebral column, and skull base. Achieving gross-total resection (GTR) has been shown to optimize overall survival (OS); however, the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) for patients with GTR is currently not well understood. Given that RT may negatively impact patient quality of life, the aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of RT for improving OS in patients who have undergone GTR of spinal chordoma through analysis of the national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

开云体育世界杯赔率

The SEER database (1975–2018) was queried for all adult patients (≥ 21 years) who underwent GTR for spinal chordoma. Bivariate analysis was conducted using chi-square testing for categorical variables, and the log-rank test was performed to find the associations of clinical variables with OS. Cox proportional hazards models were generated for multivariate analyses of the associations among clinical variables and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 263 spinal chordomas that underwent GTR were identified. The mean age of all included patients was 58.72 years, and 63.9% of patients were male. In addition, 0.4% had dedifferentiated histology. The mean follow-up was 75.54 months. Of all patients, 152 (57.8%) received no RT and 111 (42.2%) received RT. Patients with sacral tumor location (80.9% vs 51.4%, p < 0.001) were more likely not to undergo RT when compared to patients with vertebral column location. In multivariate analysis, only age ≥ 65 years was associated with poorer OS (HR 3.16, CI 1.54–5.61, p < 0.001). RT did not have a statistically significant association with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

RT after GTR of chordoma did not improve OS among SEER chordoma patients to a value that achieved statistical significance. Additional multicenter prospective studies are needed to determine the true efficacy of RT after GTR of spinal chordoma.

In开云手机版app下载安装最新版Neurosurg杂志ery: Spine Volume 39: Issue 3 (Sep 2023)

Restricted access

The influence of facility type on intracranial meningioma treatment and outcomes: predicting overall survival using the National Cancer Database

Nolan J. Brown, Julian Gendreau, Sachiv Chakravarti, Benjamin M. Abraham Jr., Yusuf Mehkri, Cathleen C. Kuo, Naib Chowdhury, and Aaron Cohen-Gadol

OBJECTIVE

There is a growing body of evidence demonstrating improved outcomes for patients with CNS neoplasms treated at academic centers (ACs) versus nonacademic centers (non-ACs), which represents a potential healthcare disparity within neurosurgery. In this paper, the authors sought to investigate the relationship between facility type and surgical outcomes in meningioma patients.

开云体育世界杯赔率

The National Cancer Database was queried for adult patients diagnosed with intracranial meningioma between 2004 and 2019. Patients were stratified by facility type, and the Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher exact test were used for bivariate comparisons of continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess whether demographic variables were associated with treatment at ACs. Furthermore, multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine whether facility type was associated with overall survival (OS) outcomes.

RESULTS

Data on 139,304 patients (74% male, 84% White) were retrieved. Patients were stratified by facility type, with 50,349 patients (36%) treated at ACs and 88,955 patients (64%) treated at non-ACs. Patients treated at ACs were more likely to have private insurance (41% vs 34%, p < 0.001) and less likely to have Medicare (46% vs 57%, p < 0.001). Patients treated at ACs were more likely to have larger tumors (36.91 mm vs 33.57 mm, p < 0.001) and more likely to undergo surgery (47% vs 34%, p < 0.001). Interestingly, patients treated at ACs had decreased comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index rating 0: 74% vs 69%) and similar income levels (income ≥ $46,000: 44% vs 43%). With respect to survival outcomes, patients treated at ACs demonstrated a higher median OS at 10 years than patients treated at non-ACs (65.2% vs 54.1%). The association of improved OS in patients treated at ACs continued to be true when adjusting for all other clinical and demographic variables (HR 0.900, 95% CI 0.882–0.918; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that facility type is associated with disparate survival outcomes in the treatment of intracranial meningiomas. Namely, patients treated at non-ACs appear to have a survival disadvantage even when controlling for additional comorbidities.

In开云手机版app下载安装最新版Neurosurg杂志ery Publish Before Print

Free access

Mechanical thrombectomy versus intravenous thrombolysis for distal large-vessel occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Muhammad Waqas, Cathleen C. Kuo, Rimal H. Dossani, Andre Monteiro, Ammad A. Baig, Modhi Alkhaldi, Justin M. Cappuzzo, Elad I. Levy, and Adnan H. Siddiqui

OBJECTIVE

While several studies have compared the feasibility and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for distal large-vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes in patients, few studies have compared MT with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) alone. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness and safety between MT and standard medical management with IVT alone for patients with distal LVOs.

开云体育世界杯赔率

PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched in order to identify studies that directly compared MT with IVT for distal LVOs (anterior cerebral artery A2, middle cerebral artery M3–4, and posterior cerebral artery P2–4). Primary outcomes of interest included a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 at 90 days posttreatment, occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and all-cause mortality at 90 days posttreatment.

RESULTS

Four studies representing a total of 381 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that the proportion of patients with an mRS score of 0 to 2 at 90 days (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.23–5.93; p = 0.861), the occurrence of sICH (OR 2.45, 95% CI 0.75–8.03; p = 0.140), and the mortality rate at 90 days (OR 1.73, 95% CI 0.66–4.55; p = 0.263) did not differ between patients who underwent MT and those who received IVT alone.

CONCLUSIONS

significan荟萃分析没有演示t difference between MT and standard medical management with regard to favorable outcome, occurrence of sICH, or 90-day mortality. Prospective clinical trials are needed to further compare the efficacy of MT with IVT alone for distal vessel occlusion.

InNeurosurgical Focus Volume 51 (2021): Issue 1 (Jul 2021): Neurosurgical Management of Stroke, Organization of Stroke Management, and AI Applications

Restricted access

Retrospective single-surgeon study of prone versus lateral robotic pedicle screw placement: a CT-based assessment of accuracy

Nolan J. Brown, Zach Pennington, Cathleen C. Kuo, Shane Shahrestani, Justin Gold, Luis D. Diaz-Aguilar, Yusuf Mehkri, Rohin Singh, Julian Gendreau, and Martin H. Pham

OBJECTIVE

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion including anterior-to-psoas oblique lumbar interbody fusion has conventionally relied on pedicle screw placement (PSP) for construct stabilization. Single-position surgery with lumbar interbody fusion in the lateral decubitus position with concomitant PSP has been associated with increased operative efficiency. What remains unclear is the accuracy of PSP with robotic guidance when compared with the more familiar prone patient positioning. The present study aimed to compare robot-assisted screw placement accuracy between patients with instrumentation placed in the prone and lateral positions.

开云体育世界杯赔率

The authors identified all consecutive patients treated with interbody fusion and PSP in the prone or lateral position by a single surgeon between January 2019 and October 2022. All pedicle screws placed were analyzed using CT scans to determine appropriate positioning according to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification grading system (grade C or worse was considered as a radiographically significant breach). Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to identify risk factors for the occurrence of a radiographically significant breach.

RESULTS

连续八十九例(690个螺丝)included, of whom 46 (477 screws) were treated in the prone position and 43 (213 screws) in the lateral decubitus position. There were fewer breaches in the prone (n = 13, 2.7%) than the lateral decubitus (n = 15, 7.0%) group (p = 0.012). Nine (1.9%) radiographically significant breaches occurred in the prone group compared with 10 (4.7%) in the lateral decubitus group (p = 0.019), for a prone versus lateral decubitus PSP accuracy rate of 98.1% versus 95.3%. There were no significant differences in BMI between prone versus lateral decubitus cohorts (30.1 vs 29.6) or patients with screw breach versus those without (31.2 vs 29.5). In multivariate models, the prone position was the only significant protective factor for screw accuracy; no other significant risk factors for screw breach were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data suggest that pedicle screws placed with robotic assistance have higher placement accuracy in the prone position. Further studies will be needed to validate the accuracy of PSP in the lateral position as single-position surgery becomes more commonplace in the treatment of spinal disorders.

In开云手机版app下载安装最新版Neurosurg杂志ery: Spine Publish Before Print

Restricted access

Robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement accuracy compared with alternative guidance in lateral single-position surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Neal A. Patel, Cathleen C. Kuo, Zach Pennington, Nolan J. Brown, Julian Gendreau, Rohin Singh, Shane Shahrestani, Candler Boyett, Luis Daniel Diaz-Aguilar, and Martin H. Pham

OBJECTIVE

While single-position surgery (SPS) eliminates the need for patient repositioning, the placement of screws in the unconventional lateral position poses unique challenges related to asymmetry relative to the surgical table. Use of robotic guidance or intraoperative navigation can help to overcome this. The aim of this study was to compare the relative accuracies offered by these various navigation modalities for pedicle screws placed in lateral SPS.

开云体育世界杯赔率

根据首选报告项目周围tic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for studies reporting pedicle screw placement accuracy using fluoroscopic, CT-navigated, O-arm, or robotic guidance in lateral SPS, and a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Included studies all compared evaluated screw placement accuracy in lateral SPS using a single navigation method. Quality assessment was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system; risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. The primary outcome, rate of pedicle screw breach, was analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

11研究包括疼痛。病人就医时最多由548主诉ts who underwent the placement of instrumentation with 2488 screws. For the fluoroscopic, CT-navigated, O-arm, and robotic guidance cohorts, there were 3, 2, 3, and 3 studies, respectively. Breach rates by modality were as follows: fluoroscopic guidance (6.6%), CT navigation (4.7%), O-arm (3.9%), and robotic guidance (3.9%). Random-effects meta-analysis showed a significant difference between studies, with an overall breach rate of 4.9% (95% CI 3.1%–7.5%; p < 0.001); however, testing for subgroup differences failed to show a significant difference between guidance modalities (QM= 0.69, df = 3; p = 0.88). Heterogeneity between studies was significant (I2= 79.0%, τ2= 0.41,χ2= 47.65, df = 10; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic guidance of screws is noninferior to alternative guidance modalities in lateral SPS; however, additional prospective studies directly comparing different guidance types are merited.

In开云手机版app下载安装最新版Neurosurg杂志ery: Spine Publish Before Print

Baidu
map