This site usescookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Letter to the Editor. Bone interface interaction in interbody fusion

Anneli A. A. Duits University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Anneli A. A. Duits in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Steven de Reuver University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Steven de Reuver in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
, and
Moyo C. Kruyt University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Moyo C. Kruyt in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD, PhD
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD$45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD$384.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD$624.00
USD$45.00
USD$384.00
USD$624.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in
  • Collapse
  • Expand
Figure from Yu et al. (pp 238–246).
  • 1.

    MaloneH,MundisGMJr,CollierM,et al.Can a bioactive interbody device reduce the cost burden of achieving lateral lumbar fusion?J Neurosurg Spine.2022;37(5):646653.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    WalshWR,PelletierMH,WangT,et al.Does implantation site influence bone ingrowth into 3D-printed porous implants?Spine J.2019;19(11):18851898.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    DuitsA,SalvatoriD,SchoutenJ,et al.Preclinical model for lumbar interbody fusion in small ruminants: rationale and guideline.J Orthop Translat.2023;38:167174.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    FogelG,MartinN,LynchK,et al.Subsidence and fusion performance of a 3D-printed porous interbody cage with stress-optimized body lattice and microporous endplates—a comprehensive mechanical and biological analysis.Spine J.2022;22(6):10281037.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    LehrAM,DuitsAAA,ReijndersMRL,et al.Assessment of posterolateral lumbar fusion: a systematic review of imaging-based fusion criteria.JBJS Rev.2022;10(10):e22.00129.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1.

    FogelG,MartinN,LynchK,et al.Subsidence and fusion performance of a 3D-printed porous interbody cage with stress-optimized body lattice and microporous endplates—a comprehensive mechanical and biological analysis.Spine J.2022;22(6):10281037.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    BerjanoP,LangellaF,DamilanoM,et al.Fusion rate following extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion.Eur Spine J.2015;24(suppl 3):369-371.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    RodgersWB,GerberEJ,PattersonJR.Fusion after minimally disruptive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Analysis of extreme lateral interbody fusion by computed tomography.SAS J.2010;4(2):6366.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    OchoaM,MaloneH,AkbarniaB,MundisGM,EastlackRE.Evaluating a nanosurface-modulated titanium interbody device in anterior lumbar interbody fusion.Poster presented at: 29th IMAST Annual Meeting,April 6–9, 2022,Miami, Florida.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    LehrAM,OnerFC,DelawiD,et al.Efficacy of a standalone microporous ceramic versus autograft in instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion: a multicenter, randomized, intrapatient controlled, noninferiority trial.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2020;45(14):944951.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 295 295 58
Full Text Views 85 85 17
PDF Downloads 69 69 29
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
Baidu
map