Multiple solutions for navigation-guided pedicle screw placement are currently available. Intraoperative imaging techniques are invaluable for spinal surgery, but often there is little attention paid to patient radiation exposure. This study aimed to compare the applied radiation doses of sliding gantry CT (SGCT)– and mobile cone-beam CT (CBCT)–based pedicle screw placement for spinal instrumentation.
The authors retrospectively analyzed 183 and 54 patients who underwent SGCT- or standard CBCT-based pedicle screw placement, respectively, for spinal instrumentation at their department between June 2019 and January 2020. SGCT uses an automated radiation dose adjustment.
Baseline characteristics, including the number of screws per patient and the number of instrumented levels, did not significantly differ between the two groups. Although the accuracy of screw placement according to Gertzbein-Robbins classification did not differ between the two groups, more screws had to be revised intraoperatively in the CBCT group (SGCT 2.7% vs CBCT 6.0%, p = 0.0036). Mean (± SD) radiation doses for the first (SGCT 484.0 ± 201.1 vs CBCT 687.4 ± 188.5 mGy*cm, p < 0.0001), second (SGCT 515.8 ± 216.3 vs CBCT 658.3 ± 220.1 mGy*cm, p < 0.0001), third (SGCT 531.3 ± 237.5 vs CBCT 641.6 ± 177.3 mGy*cm, p = 0.0140), and total (SGCT 1216.9 ± 699.3 vs CBCT 2000.3 ± 921.0 mGy*cm, p < 0.0001) scans were significantly lower for SGCT. This was also true for radiation doses per scanned level (SGCT 461.9 ± 429.3 vs CBCT 1004.1 ± 905.1 mGy*cm, p < 0.0001) and radiation doses per screw (SGCT 172.6 ± 110.1 vs CBCT 349.6 ± 273.4 mGy*cm, p < 0.0001).
The applied radiation doses were significantly lower using SGCT for navigated pedicle screw placement in spinal instrumentation. A modern CT scanner on a sliding gantry leads to lower radiation doses, especially through automated 3D radiation dose adjustment.
INCLUDE WHEN CITINGPublished online June 2, 2023; DOI: 10.3171/2023.4.SPINE23174.
DisclosuresDr. Ille reported receiving consultant fees from Brainlab, honoraria from Nexstim, nonfinancial support as a consultant from Icotec, and honoraria from Carl-Zeiss Meditec, outside the submitted work. Dr. Kirschke reported having stock in Bonescreen GmbH, receiving grants paid to the institution from ERC and DFG, and personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr. Meyer reported receiving personal fees from Brainlab during the conduct of the study, and personal fees from Ulrich Medical, outside the submitted work. Dr. Krieg reported receiving personal fees from Brainlab during the conduct of the study, personal fees from Ulrich Medical, and shares from Need Inc., outside the submitted work.
MalhamGM,Wells-QuinnT.What should my hospital buy next? Guidelines for the acquisition and application of imaging, navigation, and robotics for spine surgery.J Spine Surg.2019;5(1):155–165.
GelalisID,PaschosNK,PakosEE,et al.Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques.Eur Spine J.2012;21(2):247–255.
HaganMJ,SyedS,LearyOP,et al.椎弓根螺钉使用术中与计算机ted tomography and computer-aided spinal navigation improves screw accuracy and avoids postoperative revisions: single-center analysis of 1400 pedicle screws.World Neurosurg.2022;160:e169–e179.
FarahK,CoudertP,GraillonT,et al.Prospective comparative study in spine surgery between O-arm and Airo systems: efficacy and radiation exposure.World Neurosurg.2018;118:e175–e184.
IlleS,BaumgartL,ObermuellerT,MeyerB,KriegSM.Clinical efficiency of operating room-based sliding gantry CT as compared to mobile cone-beam CT-based navigated pedicle screw placement in 853 patients and 6733 screws.Eur Spine J.2021;30(12):3720–3730.
MengXT,GuanXF,ZhangHL,他SS.Computer navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided navigation for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a meta-analysis.Neurosurg Rev.2016;39(3):385–391.
LenskiM,HofereiterJ,TerpolilliN,et al.Dual-room CT with a sliding gantry for intraoperative imaging: feasibility and workflow analysis of an interdisciplinary concept.Int J CARS.2019;14(2):397–407.
RichterM,MattesT,CakirB.Computer-assisted posterior instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine.Eur Spine J.2004;13(1):50–59.
RichterM,CakirB,SchmidtR.Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2005;30(20):2280–2287.
RivkinMA,YocomSS.Thoracolumbar instrumentation with CT-guided navigation (O-arm) in 270 consecutive patients: accuracy rates and lessons learned.Neurosurg Focus.2014;36(3):E7.
WaschkeA,WalterJ,DuenischP,ReichartR,KalffR,EwaldC.CT-navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of pedicle screws at the thoracolumbar spine: single center experience of 4,500 screws.Eur Spine J.2013;22(3):654–660.
ZausingerS,SchederB,UhlE,他iglT,MorhardD,TonnJC.Intraoperative computed tomography with integrated navigation system in spinal stabilizations.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2009;34(26):2919–2926.
LaineT,LundT,YlikoskiM,LohikoskiJ,SchlenzkaD.Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients.Eur Spine J.2000;9(3):235–240.
他chtN,YassinH,CzabankaM,et al.Intraoperative computed tomography versus 3D C-arm imaging for navigated spinal instrumentation.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2018;43(5):370–377.
KosmopoulosV,SchizasC.椎弓根螺钉的准确性:meta-analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2007;32(3):E111–E120.
GogosS,TouzellA,LernerLB.What we know about intra-operative radiation exposure and hazards to operating theatre staff: a systematic review.ANZ J Surg.2022;92(1-2):51–56.
BandelaJR,JacobRP,ArreolaM,GriglockTM,BovaF,YangM.Use of CT-based intraoperative spinal navigation: management of radiation exposure to operator, staff, and patients.World Neurosurg.2013;79(2):390–394.
ScaroneP,VincenzoG,DistefanoD,et al.Use of the Airo mobile intraoperative CT system versus the O-arm for transpedicular screw fixation in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a retrospective cohort study of 263 patients.J Neurosurg Spine.2018;29(4):397–406.
KlinglerJH,HoedlmoserH,NaseriY.Radiation protection measures to reduce the eye lens dose in spinal surgery.Spine J.2021;21(8):1243–1245.
GertzbeinSDRS,RobbinsSE.Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).1990;15(1):11–14.
VillardJ,RyangYM,DemetriadesAK,et al.Radiation exposure to the surgeon and the patient during posterior lumbar spinal instrumentation: a prospective randomized comparison of navigated versus non-navigated freehand techniques.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2014;39(13):1004–1009.
ArifS,BradyZ,EnchevY,PeevN,EnchevaE.Minimising radiation exposure to the surgeon in minimally invasive spine surgeries: a systematic review of 15 studies.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res.2021;107(7):102795.
UhlE,ZausingerS,MorhardD,et al.Intraoperative computed tomography with integrated navigation system in a multidisciplinary operating suite.开云体育app官方网站下载入口.2009;64(5 suppl 2):231–240.
TormentiMJ,KostovDB,GardnerPA,KanterAS,SpiroRM,OkonkwoDO.Intraoperative computed tomography image-guided navigation for posterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation in spinal deformity surgery.Neurosurg Focus.2010;28(3):E11.
BourretS,ClocheT,BoueL,ThompsonW,DuboisT,Le HuecJC.Computed tomography intraoperative navigation in spinal surgery: assessment of patient radiation exposure in current practices.Int J Spine Surg.2022;16(5):909–915.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 326 | 326 | 40 |
Full Text Views | 27 | 27 | 4 |
PDF Downloads | 36 | 36 | 7 |
EPUB Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |