By minimizing imaging artifact and particle scatter, carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone (CF-PEEK) spinal implants are hypothesized to enhance radiotherapy (RT) planning/dosing and improve oncological outcomes. However, robust clinical studies comparing tumor surgery outcomes between CF-PEEK and traditional metallic implants are lacking. In this paper, the authors performed a systematic review of the literature with the aim to describe clinical outcomes in patients with spine tumors who received CF-PEEK implants, focusing on implant-related complications and oncological outcomes.
A systematic review of the literature published between database inception and May 2022 was performed in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The PubMed database was queried using the terms "carbon fiber" and "spine" or "spinal." The inclusion criteria were articles that described patients with CF-PEEK pedicle screw fixation and had a minimum of 5 patients. Case reports and phantom studies were excluded.
This review included 11 articles with 326 patients (237 with CF-PEEK–based implants and 89 with titanium-based implants). The mean follow-up period was 13.5 months, and most tumors were metastatic (67.1%). The rates of implant-related complications in the CF-PEEK and titanium groups were 7.8% and 4.7%, respectively. The rate of pedicle screw fracture was 1.7% in the CF-PEEK group and 2.4% in the titanium group. The rates of reoperation were 5.7% (with 60.0% because of implant failure or junctional kyphosis) and 4.8% (all because of implant failure or junctional kyphosis) in the CF-PEEK and titanium groups, respectively. When reported, 72.5% of patients received postoperative RT (41.0% stereotactic body RT, 30.8% fractionated RT, 25.6% proton, 2.6% carbon ion). Four articles suggested that implant artifact was reduced in the CF-PEEK group. Local recurrence occurred in 14.4% of CF-PEEK and 10.7% of titanium-implanted patients.
While CF-PEEK harbors similar implant failure rates to traditional metallic implants with reduced imaging artifact, it remains unclear whether CF-PEEK implants improve oncological outcomes. This study highlights the need for prospective, direct comparative clinical studies.
INCLUDE WHEN CITINGPublished online June 23, 2023; DOI: 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23106.
DisclosuresDr. Laufer reported personal fees from Spine Wave and Globus during the conduct of the study. Dr. Chhabra reported personal fees from Icotec for medical consulting outside the submitted work.
SchneiderU,PedroniE,LomaxA.The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning.Phys Med Biol.1996;41(1):111–124.
GiantsoudiD,De ManB,VerburgJ,et al.Metal artifacts in computed tomography for radiation therapy planning: dosimetric effects and impact of metal artifact reduction.Phys Med Biol.2017;62(8):R49–R80.
RutzHP,WeberDC,SugaharaS,et al.Extracranial chordoma: outcome in patients treated with function-preserving surgery followed by spot-scanning proton beam irradiation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2007;67(2):512–520.
SniderJW,SchneiderRA,Poelma-TapD,et al.Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors after pencil-beam scanning proton radiation therapy for spinal chordomas: a large, single-institution cohort.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2018;101(1):226–233.
MurrayFR,SniderJW,SchneiderRA,et al.Prognostic factors for spinal chordomas and chondrosarcomas treated with postoperative pencil-beam scanning proton therapy: a large, single-institution experience.J Neurosurg Spine.2020;32(6):921–930.
MastellaE,MolinelliS,MagroG,et al.Dosimetric characterization of carbon fiber stabilization devices for post-operative particle therapy.Phys Med.2017;44:18–25.
NevelskyA,BorzovE,DanielS,Bar-DeromaR.Perturbation effects of the carbon fiber-PEEK screws on radiotherapy dose distribution.J Appl Clin Med Phys.2017;18(2):62–68.
ShiC,LinH,HuangS,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) spinal hardware for proton and photon planning.Technol Cancer Res Treat.2022;21:15330338221091700.
KrätzigT,MendeKC,MohmeM,et al.Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK versus titanium implants: an in vitro comparison of susceptibility artifacts in CT and MR imaging.Neurosurg Rev.2021;44(4):2163–2170.
PoelR,BelosiF,AlbertiniF,et al.Assessing the advantages of CFR-PEEK over titanium spinal stabilization implants in proton therapy—a phantom study.Phys Med Biol.2020;65(24):245031.
HuberFA,SprengelK,MüllerL,GrafLC,OsterhoffG,GuggenbergerR.Comparison of different CT metal artifact reduction strategies for standard titanium and carbon-fiber reinforced polymer implants in sheep cadavers.BMC Med Imaging.2021;21(1):29.
UriO,FolmanY,LauferG,BehrbalkE.A novel spine fixation system made entirely of carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK composite: an in vitro mechanical evaluation.Adv Orthop.2020;2020:4796136.
LindtnerRA,SchmidR,NydeggerT,KonschakeM,SchmoelzW.Pedicle screw anchorage of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK screws under cyclic loading.Eur Spine J.2018;27(8):1775–1784.
OikonomidisS,GrevenJ,BredowJ,et al.Biomechanical effects of posterior pedicle screw-based instrumentation using titanium versus carbon fiber reinforced PEEK in an osteoporotic spine human cadaver model.Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon).2020;80:105153.
KurtzSM,DevineJN.PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants.Biomaterials.2007;28(32):4845–4869.
PageMJ,McKenzieJE,BossuytPM,et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.BMJ.2021;372(71):n71.
NealMT,RichardsAE,CurleyKL,et al.Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK instrumentation in the spinal oncology population: a retrospective series demonstrating technique, feasibility, and clinical outcomes.Neurosurg Focus.2021;50(5):E13.
CofanoF,Di PernaG,MonticelliM,et al.Carbon fiber reinforced vs titanium implants for fixation in spinal metastases: a comparative clinical study about safety and effectiveness of the new "carbon-strategy."J Clin Neurosci.2020;75:106–111.
BorianiS,PipolaV,CecchinatoR,et al.Composite PEEK/carbon fiber rods in the treatment for bone tumors of the cervical spine: a case series.Eur Spine J.2020;29(12):3229–3236.
TedescoG,GasbarriniA,BandieraS,GhermandiR,BorianiS.Composite PEEK/carbon fiber implants can increase the effectiveness of radiotherapy in the management of spine tumors.J Spine Surg.2017;3(3):323–329.
BorianiS,TedescoG,MingL,et al.Carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK fixation system in the treatment of spine tumors: a preliminary report.Eur Spine J.2018;27(4):874–881.
RingelF,RyangYM,KirschkeJS,et al.Radiolucent carbon fiber-reinforced pedicle screws for treatment of spinal tumors: advantages for radiation planning and follow-up imaging.World Neurosurg.2017;105:294–30.1.
BorianiS,BandieraS,BiaginiR,De IureF,GiuntiA.The use of the carbon-fiber reinforced modular implant for the reconstruction of the anterior column of the spine. A clinical and experimental study conducted on 42 cases.Chir Organi Mov.2000;85(4):30.9–335.
MütherM,LüthgeS,GerwingM,StummerW,SchwakeM.Management of spinal dumbbell tumors via a minimally invasive posterolateral approach and carbon fiber-reinforced polyether ether ketone instrumentation: technical note and surgical case series.World Neurosurg.2021;151:277–283.e1.
WagnerA,HaagE,JoergerAK,et al.Cement-augmented carbon fiber-reinforced pedicle screw instrumentation for spinal metastases: safety and efficacy.World Neurosurg.2021;154:e536–e546.
MüllerBS,RyangYM,OechsnerM,et al.The dosimetric impact of stabilizing spinal implants in radiotherapy treatment planning with protons and photons: standard titanium alloy vs. radiolucent carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK systems.J Appl Clin Med Phys.2020;21(8):6–14.
BilskyMH,LauferI,BurchS.Shifting paradigms in the treatment of metastatic spine disease.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2009;34(22 suppl):S101–S107.
PatchellRA,TibbsPA,RegineWF,et al.Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial.Lancet.2005;366(9486):643–648.
LauferI,IorgulescuJB,ChapmanT,et al.当地的疾病控制pinal metastases following "separation surgery" and adjuvant hypofractionated or high-dose single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery: outcome analysis in 186 patients.J Neurosurg Spine.2013;18(3):207–214.
MoussazadehN,LauferI,YamadaY,BilskyMH.Separation surgery for spinal metastases: effect of spinal radiosurgery on surgical treatment goals.Cancer Contr.2014;21(2):168–174.
BarzilaiO,AmatoMK,McLaughlinL,et al.Hybrid surgery-radiosurgery therapy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: a prospective evaluation using patient-reported outcomes.Neurooncol Pract.2018;5(2):104–113.
AmankulorNM,XuR,IorgulescuJB,et al.The incidence and patterns of hardware failure after separation surgery in patients with spinal metastatic tumors.Spine J.2014;14(9):1850–1859.
PedreiraR,Abu-BonsrahN,Karim AhmedA,et al.Hardware failure in patients with metastatic cancer to the spine.J Clin Neurosci.2017;45:166–171.
YeeTJ,Saadehy,StrongMJ,et al.Survival, fusion, and hardware failure after surgery for spinal metastatic disease.J Neurosurg Spine.2021;34(4):665–672.
DeLaneyTF,LiebschNJ,PedlowFX,et al.Long-term results of Phase II study of high dose photon/proton radiotherapy in the management of spine chordomas, chondrosarcomas, and other sarcomas.J Surg Oncol.2014;110(2):115–122.
RotondoRL,FolkertW,LiebschNJ,et al.High-dose proton-based radiation therapy in the management of spine chordomas: outcomes and clinicopathological prognostic factors.J Neurosurg Spine.2015;23(6):788–797.
IndelicatoDJ,RotondoRL,Begosh-MayneD,et al.A prospective outcomes study of proton therapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the spine.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2016;95(1):297–30.3.
Al-OmairA,MasucciL,Masson-CoteL,et al.Surgical resection of epidural disease improves local control following postoperative spine stereotactic body radiotherapy.Neuro Oncol.2013;15(10):1413–1419.
RedmondKJ,SciubbaD,KhanM,et al.A phase 2 study of post-operative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for solid tumor spine metastases.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2020;106(2):261–268.
ShenFH,GasbarriniA,LuiDF,ReynoldsJ,CapuaJ,BorianiS.Integrated custom composite polyetheretherketone/carbon fiber (PEEK/CF) vertebral body replacement (VBR) in the treatment of bone tumors of the spine: a preliminary report from a multicenter study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2022;47(3):252–260.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 337 | 337 | 137 |
Full Text Views | 61 | 61 | 34 |
PDF Downloads | 82 | 82 | 48 |
EPUB Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |