This site usescookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Carbon fiber–reinforced PEEK spinal implants for primary and metastatic spine tumors: a systematic review on implant complications and radiotherapy benefits

Presented at the 2023 AANS/CNS Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves

Hammad A. Khan Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York; and

Search for other papers by Hammad A. Khan in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Roee Ber Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York; and

Search for other papers by Roee Ber in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Sean N. Neifert Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York; and

Search for other papers by Sean N. Neifert in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
David B. Kurland Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York; and

Search for other papers by David B. Kurland in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD, PhD
,
Ilya Laufer Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York; and

Search for other papers by Ilya Laufer in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Douglas Kondziolka Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York; and

Search for other papers by Douglas Kondziolka in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Arpit Chhabra New York Proton Center, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Arpit Chhabra in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Anthony K. Frempong-Boadu Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York; and

Search for other papers by Anthony K. Frempong-Boadu in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
, and
Darryl Lau Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York; and

Search for other papers by Darryl Lau in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD$45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD$384.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD$624.00
USD$45.00
USD$384.00
USD$624.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

By minimizing imaging artifact and particle scatter, carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone (CF-PEEK) spinal implants are hypothesized to enhance radiotherapy (RT) planning/dosing and improve oncological outcomes. However, robust clinical studies comparing tumor surgery outcomes between CF-PEEK and traditional metallic implants are lacking. In this paper, the authors performed a systematic review of the literature with the aim to describe clinical outcomes in patients with spine tumors who received CF-PEEK implants, focusing on implant-related complications and oncological outcomes.

开云体育世界杯赔率

A systematic review of the literature published between database inception and May 2022 was performed in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The PubMed database was queried using the terms "carbon fiber" and "spine" or "spinal." The inclusion criteria were articles that described patients with CF-PEEK pedicle screw fixation and had a minimum of 5 patients. Case reports and phantom studies were excluded.

RESULTS

This review included 11 articles with 326 patients (237 with CF-PEEK–based implants and 89 with titanium-based implants). The mean follow-up period was 13.5 months, and most tumors were metastatic (67.1%). The rates of implant-related complications in the CF-PEEK and titanium groups were 7.8% and 4.7%, respectively. The rate of pedicle screw fracture was 1.7% in the CF-PEEK group and 2.4% in the titanium group. The rates of reoperation were 5.7% (with 60.0% because of implant failure or junctional kyphosis) and 4.8% (all because of implant failure or junctional kyphosis) in the CF-PEEK and titanium groups, respectively. When reported, 72.5% of patients received postoperative RT (41.0% stereotactic body RT, 30.8% fractionated RT, 25.6% proton, 2.6% carbon ion). Four articles suggested that implant artifact was reduced in the CF-PEEK group. Local recurrence occurred in 14.4% of CF-PEEK and 10.7% of titanium-implanted patients.

CONCLUSIONS

While CF-PEEK harbors similar implant failure rates to traditional metallic implants with reduced imaging artifact, it remains unclear whether CF-PEEK implants improve oncological outcomes. This study highlights the need for prospective, direct comparative clinical studies.

ABBREVIATIONS

CF-PEEK = carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone ; PTV = planning target volume ; RT = radiotherapy ; SBRT = stereotactic body RT .
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    SchneiderU,PedroniE,LomaxA.The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning.Phys Med Biol.1996;41(1):111124.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    GiantsoudiD,De ManB,VerburgJ,et al.Metal artifacts in computed tomography for radiation therapy planning: dosimetric effects and impact of metal artifact reduction.Phys Med Biol.2017;62(8):R49R80.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    RutzHP,WeberDC,SugaharaS,et al.Extracranial chordoma: outcome in patients treated with function-preserving surgery followed by spot-scanning proton beam irradiation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2007;67(2):512520.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    SniderJW,SchneiderRA,Poelma-TapD,et al.Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors after pencil-beam scanning proton radiation therapy for spinal chordomas: a large, single-institution cohort.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2018;101(1):226233.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    MurrayFR,SniderJW,SchneiderRA,et al.Prognostic factors for spinal chordomas and chondrosarcomas treated with postoperative pencil-beam scanning proton therapy: a large, single-institution experience.J Neurosurg Spine.2020;32(6):921930.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    MastellaE,MolinelliS,MagroG,et al.Dosimetric characterization of carbon fiber stabilization devices for post-operative particle therapy.Phys Med.2017;44:1825.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    NevelskyA,BorzovE,DanielS,Bar-DeromaR.Perturbation effects of the carbon fiber-PEEK screws on radiotherapy dose distribution.J Appl Clin Med Phys.2017;18(2):6268.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    ShiC,LinH,HuangS,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) spinal hardware for proton and photon planning.Technol Cancer Res Treat.2022;21:15330338221091700.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    KrätzigT,MendeKC,MohmeM,et al.Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK versus titanium implants: an in vitro comparison of susceptibility artifacts in CT and MR imaging.Neurosurg Rev.2021;44(4):21632170.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    PoelR,BelosiF,AlbertiniF,et al.Assessing the advantages of CFR-PEEK over titanium spinal stabilization implants in proton therapy—a phantom study.Phys Med Biol.2020;65(24):245031.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    HuberFA,SprengelK,MüllerL,GrafLC,OsterhoffG,GuggenbergerR.Comparison of different CT metal artifact reduction strategies for standard titanium and carbon-fiber reinforced polymer implants in sheep cadavers.BMC Med Imaging.2021;21(1):29.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    UriO,FolmanY,LauferG,BehrbalkE.A novel spine fixation system made entirely of carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK composite: an in vitro mechanical evaluation.Adv Orthop.2020;2020:4796136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    LindtnerRA,SchmidR,NydeggerT,KonschakeM,SchmoelzW.Pedicle screw anchorage of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK screws under cyclic loading.Eur Spine J.2018;27(8):17751784.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    OikonomidisS,GrevenJ,BredowJ,et al.Biomechanical effects of posterior pedicle screw-based instrumentation using titanium versus carbon fiber reinforced PEEK in an osteoporotic spine human cadaver model.Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon).2020;80:105153.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    KurtzSM,DevineJN.PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants.Biomaterials.2007;28(32):48454869.

  • 16

    PageMJ,McKenzieJE,BossuytPM,et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.BMJ.2021;372(71):n71.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    NealMT,RichardsAE,CurleyKL,et al.Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK instrumentation in the spinal oncology population: a retrospective series demonstrating technique, feasibility, and clinical outcomes.Neurosurg Focus.2021;50(5):E13.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    CofanoF,Di PernaG,MonticelliM,et al.Carbon fiber reinforced vs titanium implants for fixation in spinal metastases: a comparative clinical study about safety and effectiveness of the new "carbon-strategy."J Clin Neurosci.2020;75:106111.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    BorianiS,PipolaV,CecchinatoR,et al.Composite PEEK/carbon fiber rods in the treatment for bone tumors of the cervical spine: a case series.Eur Spine J.2020;29(12):32293236.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    TedescoG,GasbarriniA,BandieraS,GhermandiR,BorianiS.Composite PEEK/carbon fiber implants can increase the effectiveness of radiotherapy in the management of spine tumors.J Spine Surg.2017;3(3):323329.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    BorianiS,TedescoG,MingL,et al.Carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK fixation system in the treatment of spine tumors: a preliminary report.Eur Spine J.2018;27(4):874881.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    RingelF,RyangYM,KirschkeJS,et al.Radiolucent carbon fiber-reinforced pedicle screws for treatment of spinal tumors: advantages for radiation planning and follow-up imaging.World Neurosurg.2017;105:29430.1.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    BorianiS,BandieraS,BiaginiR,De IureF,GiuntiA.The use of the carbon-fiber reinforced modular implant for the reconstruction of the anterior column of the spine. A clinical and experimental study conducted on 42 cases.Chir Organi Mov.2000;85(4):30.9335.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    MütherM,LüthgeS,GerwingM,StummerW,SchwakeM.Management of spinal dumbbell tumors via a minimally invasive posterolateral approach and carbon fiber-reinforced polyether ether ketone instrumentation: technical note and surgical case series.World Neurosurg.2021;151:277283.e1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    WagnerA,HaagE,JoergerAK,et al.Cement-augmented carbon fiber-reinforced pedicle screw instrumentation for spinal metastases: safety and efficacy.World Neurosurg.2021;154:e536e546.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    MüllerBS,RyangYM,OechsnerM,et al.The dosimetric impact of stabilizing spinal implants in radiotherapy treatment planning with protons and photons: standard titanium alloy vs. radiolucent carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK systems.J Appl Clin Med Phys.2020;21(8):614.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    BilskyMH,LauferI,BurchS.Shifting paradigms in the treatment of metastatic spine disease.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2009;34(22 suppl):S101S107.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    PatchellRA,TibbsPA,RegineWF,et al.Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial.Lancet.2005;366(9486):643648.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    LauferI,IorgulescuJB,ChapmanT,et al.当地的疾病控制pinal metastases following "separation surgery" and adjuvant hypofractionated or high-dose single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery: outcome analysis in 186 patients.J Neurosurg Spine.2013;18(3):207214.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    MoussazadehN,LauferI,YamadaY,BilskyMH.Separation surgery for spinal metastases: effect of spinal radiosurgery on surgical treatment goals.Cancer Contr.2014;21(2):168174.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    BarzilaiO,AmatoMK,McLaughlinL,et al.Hybrid surgery-radiosurgery therapy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: a prospective evaluation using patient-reported outcomes.Neurooncol Pract.2018;5(2):104113.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    AmankulorNM,XuR,IorgulescuJB,et al.The incidence and patterns of hardware failure after separation surgery in patients with spinal metastatic tumors.Spine J.2014;14(9):18501859.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    PedreiraR,Abu-BonsrahN,Karim AhmedA,et al.Hardware failure in patients with metastatic cancer to the spine.J Clin Neurosci.2017;45:166171.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    YeeTJ,Saadehy,StrongMJ,et al.Survival, fusion, and hardware failure after surgery for spinal metastatic disease.J Neurosurg Spine.2021;34(4):665672.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    DeLaneyTF,LiebschNJ,PedlowFX,et al.Long-term results of Phase II study of high dose photon/proton radiotherapy in the management of spine chordomas, chondrosarcomas, and other sarcomas.J Surg Oncol.2014;110(2):115122.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    RotondoRL,FolkertW,LiebschNJ,et al.High-dose proton-based radiation therapy in the management of spine chordomas: outcomes and clinicopathological prognostic factors.J Neurosurg Spine.2015;23(6):788797.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    IndelicatoDJ,RotondoRL,Begosh-MayneD,et al.A prospective outcomes study of proton therapy for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the spine.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2016;95(1):29730.3.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    Al-OmairA,MasucciL,Masson-CoteL,et al.Surgical resection of epidural disease improves local control following postoperative spine stereotactic body radiotherapy.Neuro Oncol.2013;15(10):14131419.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    RedmondKJ,SciubbaD,KhanM,et al.A phase 2 study of post-operative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for solid tumor spine metastases.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2020;106(2):261268.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    ShenFH,GasbarriniA,LuiDF,ReynoldsJ,CapuaJ,BorianiS.Integrated custom composite polyetheretherketone/carbon fiber (PEEK/CF) vertebral body replacement (VBR) in the treatment of bone tumors of the spine: a preliminary report from a multicenter study.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2022;47(3):252260.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 337 337 137
Full Text Views 61 61 34
PDF Downloads 82 82 48
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
Baidu
map