This site usescookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Does disc distraction after cervical total disc arthroplasty impact range of motion and patient-reported outcomes?

Vincent P. Federico Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Search for other papers by Vincent P. Federico in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Athan G. Zavras Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Search for other papers by Athan G. Zavras in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
James W. Nie Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Search for other papers by James W. Nie in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
BS
,
亚历山大·j·巴特勒 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Search for other papers by Alexander J. Butler in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Mohammed A. Munim Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

寻找其他论文穆罕默德μnim in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
BS
,
Michael T. Nolte Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Search for other papers by Michael T. Nolte in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Gregory D. Lopez Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Search for other papers by Gregory D. Lopez in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Howard S. An Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Search for other papers by Howard S. An in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Matthew W. Colman Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Search for other papers by Matthew W. Colman in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
, and
Frank M. Phillips Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Search for other papers by Frank M. Phillips in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD$45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD$384.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD$624.00
USD$45.00
USD$384.00
USD$624.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

Total disc arthroplasty (TDA) has been established as a safe and effective alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spine pathology. However, there remains a paucity of studies in the literature regarding the amount of disc height distraction that can be tolerated, as well as its impact on kinematic and clinical outcomes.

开云体育世界杯赔率

Patients who underwent 1- or 2-level cervical TDA with a minimum follow-up of 1 year with lateral flexion/extension and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were included. Middle disc space height was measured on preoperative and 6-week postoperative lateral radiographs to quantify the magnitude of disc space distraction, and patients were grouped into < 2-mm distraction and > 2-mm distraction groups. Radiographic outcomes included operative segment lordosis, segmental range of motion (ROM) on flexion/extension, cervical (C2–7) ROM on flexion/extension, and heterotopic ossification (HO). General health and disease-specific PROMs were compared at the preoperative, 6-week, and final postoperative time points. The independent-samples t-test and chi-square test were used to compare outcomes between groups, while multivariate linear regression was used to adjust for baseline differences.

RESULTS

Fifty patients who underwent cervical TDA at 59 levels were included in the analysis. Distraction < 2 mm was seen at 30 levels (50.85%), while distraction > 2 mm was observed at 29 levels (49.15%). Radiographically, after adjustment for baseline differences, C2–7 ROM was significantly greater in the patients who underwent TDA with < 2-mm disc space distraction at final follow-up (51.35° ± 13.76° vs 39.19° ± 10.52°, p = 0.002), with a trend toward significance in the early postoperative period. There were no significant postoperative differences in segmental lordosis, segmental ROM, or HO grades. After the authors controlled for baseline differences, < 2-mm distraction of the disc space led to significantly greater improvement in visual analog scale (VAS)–neck scores at 6 weeks (−3.68 ± 3.12 vs −2.24 ± 2.70, p = 0.031) and final follow-up (−4.59 ± 2.74 vs −1.70 ± 3.03, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with < 2-mm disc height difference had increased C2–7 ROM at final follow-up and significantly greater improvement in neck pain after controlling for baseline differences. Limiting differences in disc space height to < 2 mm affected C2–7 ROM but not segmental ROM, suggesting that less distraction may result in more harmonious kinematics between all cervical levels.

ABBREVIATIONS

ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion ; HO = heterotopic ossification ; 我CC = intraclass correlation coefficient ; MCS = Mental Component Score ; NDI = Neck Disability Index ; PCS = Physical Component Score ; PROM = patient-reported outcome measure ; ROM = range of motion ; TDA = total disc arthroplasty ; VAS = visual analog scale ; VR-12 = Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey .
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    GornetMF,BurkusJK,ShaffreyME,SchranckFW,CopayAG.Cervical disc arthroplasty: 10-year outcomes of the Prestige LP cervical disc at a single level.J Neurosurg Spine.2019;31(3):317325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    LavelleWF,RiewKD,LeviAD,FlormanJE.Ten-year outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the BRYAN cervical disc: results from a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2019;44(9):601608.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    WangQL,TuZM,HuP,et al.Long-term results comparing cervical disc arthroplasty to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Orthop Surg.2020;12(1):1630.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    ByvaltsevVA,Stepanov我A,RiewDK.Mid-term to long-term outcomes after total cervical disk arthroplasty compared with anterior diskectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clin Spine Surg.2020;33(5):192200.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    KellyMP,EliasbergCD,RileyMS,AjiboyeRM,SooHooNF.Reoperation and complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty: a study of 52,395 cases.Eur Spine J.2018;27(6):14321439.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    PalejwalaSK,RughaniAI,DumontTM.宫颈磁盘arthroplast使用率的提高y in university hospitals with regional variation and socioeconomic discrepancies.World Neurosurg.2017;99:433438.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    ParkDK,LinEL,PhillipsFM.我ndex and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2011;36(9):721730.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    NesterenkoSO,RileyLH我我我,SkolaskyRL.Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: current state and trends in treatment for cervical disc pathology.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2012;37(17):14701474.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    AuerbachJD,AnakwenzeOA,MilbyAH,LonnerBS,BalderstonRA.Segmental contribution toward total cervical range of motion: a comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2011;36(25):E1593E1599.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    LiJ,LiY,KongF,ZhangD,ZhangY,ShenY.Adjacent segment degeneration after single-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion: disc space distraction and its impact on clinical outcomes.J Clin Neurosci.2015;22(3):566569.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    AbudouainiH,HuangC,LiuH,et al.Change in the postoperative intervertebral space height and its impact on clinical and radiological outcomes after ACDF surgery using a zero-profile device: a single-centre retrospective study of 138 cases.BMC Musculoskelet Disord.2021;22(1):543.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    GodlewskiB,StachuraMK,CzepkoRA,BanachM,CzepkoR.Analysis of changes in cervical spinal curvature and intervertebral disk space height following ACDF surgery in a group of 100 patients followed up for 12 months.J Clin Neurosci.2018;52:9299.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    KooTK,LiMY.A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research.J Chiropr Med.2016;15(2):155163.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    McAfeePC,CunninghamBW,DevineJ,WilliamsE,Yu-YahiroJ.Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement.J Spinal Disord Tech.2003;16(4):384389.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    ZavrasAG,SullivanTB,SinghK,PhillipsFM,ColmanMW.Failure in cervical total disc arthroplasty: single institution experience, systematic review of the literature, and proposal of the RUSH TDA failure classification system.Spine J.2022;(3):353-369.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    WangXF,MengY,LiuH,WangBY,HongY.The impact of different artificial disc heights during total cervical disc replacement: an in vitro biomechanical study.J Orthop Surg Res.2021;16(1):12.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    HuY,LvG,RenS,JohansenD.Mid-to long-term outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of eight prospective randomized controlled trials.PLoS One.2016;11(2):e0149312.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    RichterM,WilkeHJ,KlugerP,ClaesL,PuhlW.Load-displacement properties of the normal and injured lower cervical spine in vitro.Eur Spine J.2000;9(2):104108.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    YuanW,ZhangH,ZhouX,WuW,ZhuY.The influence of artificial cervical disc prosthesis height on the cervical biomechanics: a finite element study.World Neurosurg.2018;113:e490e498.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    TraynelisVC.The Prestige cervical disc.Neurosurg Clin N Am.2005;16(4):621628, vi.

  • 21

    ChiJH,AmesCP,TayB.General considerations for cervical arthroplasty with technique for ProDisc-C.Neurosurg Clin N Am.2005;16(4):609619, vi.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    HaSM,KimJH,OhSH,SongJH,KimHI,ShinDA.Vertebral distraction during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion causes postoperative neck pain.J Korean Neurosurg Soc.2013;53(5):288292.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    BaiJ,ZhangX,ZhangD,et al.我mpact of over distraction on occurrence of axial symptom after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.我nt J Clin Exp Med.2015;8(10):1974619756.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    ChangH,BaekDH,ChoiBW.The relationship between increased intervertebral disc height and development of postoperative axial neck pain after anterior cervical fusion.J Korean Neurosurg Soc.2014;55(6):343347.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    KaramianBA,LevyHA,CansecoJA,et al.Does facet distraction affect patient outcomes after ACDF?Global Spine J.2023;13(3):689695.

  • 26

    LawlessMH,YoonEJ,JasinskiJM,et al.我mpact of interspace distraction on fusion and clinical outcomes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a longitudinal cohort study.Asian Spine J.2022;16(3):369374.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    LeeDH,LeeJ,LeeH,ChoJ,HwangC,LeeC.Establishing a relationship using CT between facet distraction and clinical outcomes after ACDF.Spine J.Published online February 14, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2023.02.006

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    WellbornCC,SturmPF,孵化RS,BomzeSR,JablonskiK.我ntraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of cervical spine measurements.J Pediatr Orthop.2000;20(1):6670.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    LiH,LouJ,LiuH,WangB.Effect of intervertebral disc height on the range of motion and clinical outcomes after single-level implantation of Prestige LP cervical disc prosthesis.Clin Neurol Neurosurg.2016;148:14.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    WangX,LiuH,MengY,et al.Effect of disc height and degree of distraction on heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement.World Neurosurg.2021;145:e100e107.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    YangX,BartelsRHMA,DonkR,et al.Does heterotopic ossification in cervical arthroplasty affect clinical outcome?World Neurosurg.2019;131:e408e414.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    ZhouHH,QuY,DongRP,KangMY,ZhaoJW.Does heterotopic ossification affect the outcomes of cervical total disc replacement? A meta-analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2015;40(6):E332E340.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    ColmanMW,ZavrasAG,FedericoVP,et al.Longitudinal assessment of segmental motion of the cervical spine following total disc arthroplasty: a comparative analysis of devices.J Neurosurg Spine.2022;37(4):556562.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    PhamM,PhanK,Teng,MobbsRJ.Comparative study between M6-C and Mobi-C cervical artificial disc replacement: biomechanical outcomes and comparison with normative data.Orthop Surg.2018;10(2):8488.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    PatwardhanAG,HaveyRM.Prosthesis design influences segmental contribution to total cervical motion after cervical disc arthroplasty.Eur Spine J.2020;29(11):27132721.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    AbudouainiH,LiuH,HuangC,et al.Effect of changes in postoperative intervertebral space height on clinical and radiological outcomes after cervical disc replacement.World Neurosurg.2021;145:e61e67.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    RihnJA,RadcliffK,HippJ,et al.Radiographic variables that may predict clinical outcomes in cervical disk replacement surgery.J Spinal Disord Tech.2015;28(3):106113.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    KautherMD,PiotrowskiM,HussmannB,LendemansS,WedemeyerC.Cervical range of motion and strength in 4,293 young male adults with chronic neck pain.Eur Spine J.2012;21(8):15221527.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 380 380 102
Full Text Views 44 44 11
PDF Downloads 55 55 15
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
Baidu
map