Total disc arthroplasty (TDA) has been established as a safe and effective alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spine pathology. However, there remains a paucity of studies in the literature regarding the amount of disc height distraction that can be tolerated, as well as its impact on kinematic and clinical outcomes.
Patients who underwent 1- or 2-level cervical TDA with a minimum follow-up of 1 year with lateral flexion/extension and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were included. Middle disc space height was measured on preoperative and 6-week postoperative lateral radiographs to quantify the magnitude of disc space distraction, and patients were grouped into < 2-mm distraction and > 2-mm distraction groups. Radiographic outcomes included operative segment lordosis, segmental range of motion (ROM) on flexion/extension, cervical (C2–7) ROM on flexion/extension, and heterotopic ossification (HO). General health and disease-specific PROMs were compared at the preoperative, 6-week, and final postoperative time points. The independent-samples t-test and chi-square test were used to compare outcomes between groups, while multivariate linear regression was used to adjust for baseline differences.
Fifty patients who underwent cervical TDA at 59 levels were included in the analysis. Distraction < 2 mm was seen at 30 levels (50.85%), while distraction > 2 mm was observed at 29 levels (49.15%). Radiographically, after adjustment for baseline differences, C2–7 ROM was significantly greater in the patients who underwent TDA with < 2-mm disc space distraction at final follow-up (51.35° ± 13.76° vs 39.19° ± 10.52°, p = 0.002), with a trend toward significance in the early postoperative period. There were no significant postoperative differences in segmental lordosis, segmental ROM, or HO grades. After the authors controlled for baseline differences, < 2-mm distraction of the disc space led to significantly greater improvement in visual analog scale (VAS)–neck scores at 6 weeks (−3.68 ± 3.12 vs −2.24 ± 2.70, p = 0.031) and final follow-up (−4.59 ± 2.74 vs −1.70 ± 3.03, p = 0.008).
Patients with < 2-mm disc height difference had increased C2–7 ROM at final follow-up and significantly greater improvement in neck pain after controlling for baseline differences. Limiting differences in disc space height to < 2 mm affected C2–7 ROM but not segmental ROM, suggesting that less distraction may result in more harmonious kinematics between all cervical levels.
我NCLUDE WHEN CITINGPublished online June 2, 2023; DOI: 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23160.
DisclosuresDr. An reported royalties received from Zimmer Spine for anterior cervical plate design. Dr. Phillips reported royalties and stock from NuVasive and SI Bone; personal fees from Stryker, Medtronic, Globus, and Orthofix; and stock from Augmedics, Spinal Simplicity, Surgio, Edge Surgical, and Providence outside the submitted work.
GornetMF,BurkusJK,ShaffreyME,SchranckFW,CopayAG.Cervical disc arthroplasty: 10-year outcomes of the Prestige LP cervical disc at a single level.J Neurosurg Spine.2019;31(3):317–325.
LavelleWF,RiewKD,LeviAD,FlormanJE.Ten-year outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the BRYAN cervical disc: results from a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2019;44(9):601–608.
WangQL,TuZM,HuP,et al.Long-term results comparing cervical disc arthroplasty to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Orthop Surg.2020;12(1):16–30.
ByvaltsevVA,Stepanov我A,RiewDK.Mid-term to long-term outcomes after total cervical disk arthroplasty compared with anterior diskectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clin Spine Surg.2020;33(5):192–200.
KellyMP,EliasbergCD,RileyMS,AjiboyeRM,SooHooNF.Reoperation and complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty: a study of 52,395 cases.Eur Spine J.2018;27(6):1432–1439.
PalejwalaSK,RughaniAI,DumontTM.宫颈磁盘arthroplast使用率的提高y in university hospitals with regional variation and socioeconomic discrepancies.World Neurosurg.2017;99:433–438.
ParkDK,LinEL,PhillipsFM.我ndex and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2011;36(9):721–730.
NesterenkoSO,RileyLH我我我,SkolaskyRL.Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: current state and trends in treatment for cervical disc pathology.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2012;37(17):1470–1474.
AuerbachJD,AnakwenzeOA,MilbyAH,LonnerBS,BalderstonRA.Segmental contribution toward total cervical range of motion: a comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2011;36(25):E1593–E1599.
LiJ,LiY,KongF,ZhangD,ZhangY,ShenY.Adjacent segment degeneration after single-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion: disc space distraction and its impact on clinical outcomes.J Clin Neurosci.2015;22(3):566–569.
AbudouainiH,HuangC,LiuH,et al.Change in the postoperative intervertebral space height and its impact on clinical and radiological outcomes after ACDF surgery using a zero-profile device: a single-centre retrospective study of 138 cases.BMC Musculoskelet Disord.2021;22(1):543.
GodlewskiB,StachuraMK,CzepkoRA,BanachM,CzepkoR.Analysis of changes in cervical spinal curvature and intervertebral disk space height following ACDF surgery in a group of 100 patients followed up for 12 months.J Clin Neurosci.2018;52:92–99.
KooTK,LiMY.A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research.J Chiropr Med.2016;15(2):155–163.
McAfeePC,CunninghamBW,DevineJ,WilliamsE,Yu-YahiroJ.Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement.J Spinal Disord Tech.2003;16(4):384–389.
ZavrasAG,SullivanTB,SinghK,PhillipsFM,ColmanMW.Failure in cervical total disc arthroplasty: single institution experience, systematic review of the literature, and proposal of the RUSH TDA failure classification system.Spine J.2022;(3):353-369.
WangXF,MengY,LiuH,WangBY,HongY.The impact of different artificial disc heights during total cervical disc replacement: an in vitro biomechanical study.J Orthop Surg Res.2021;16(1):12.
HuY,LvG,RenS,JohansenD.Mid-to long-term outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of eight prospective randomized controlled trials.PLoS One.2016;11(2):e0149312.
RichterM,WilkeHJ,KlugerP,ClaesL,PuhlW.Load-displacement properties of the normal and injured lower cervical spine in vitro.Eur Spine J.2000;9(2):104–108.
YuanW,ZhangH,ZhouX,WuW,ZhuY.The influence of artificial cervical disc prosthesis height on the cervical biomechanics: a finite element study.World Neurosurg.2018;113:e490–e498.
TraynelisVC.The Prestige cervical disc.Neurosurg Clin N Am.2005;16(4):621–628, vi.
ChiJH,AmesCP,TayB.General considerations for cervical arthroplasty with technique for ProDisc-C.Neurosurg Clin N Am.2005;16(4):609–619, vi.
HaSM,KimJH,OhSH,SongJH,KimHI,ShinDA.Vertebral distraction during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion causes postoperative neck pain.J Korean Neurosurg Soc.2013;53(5):288–292.
BaiJ,ZhangX,ZhangD,et al.我mpact of over distraction on occurrence of axial symptom after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.我nt J Clin Exp Med.2015;8(10):19746–19756.
ChangH,BaekDH,ChoiBW.The relationship between increased intervertebral disc height and development of postoperative axial neck pain after anterior cervical fusion.J Korean Neurosurg Soc.2014;55(6):343–347.
KaramianBA,LevyHA,CansecoJA,et al.Does facet distraction affect patient outcomes after ACDF?Global Spine J.2023;13(3):689–695.
LawlessMH,YoonEJ,JasinskiJM,et al.我mpact of interspace distraction on fusion and clinical outcomes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a longitudinal cohort study.Asian Spine J.2022;16(3):369–374.
LeeDH,LeeJ,LeeH,ChoJ,HwangC,LeeC.Establishing a relationship using CT between facet distraction and clinical outcomes after ACDF.Spine J.Published online February 14, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2023.02.006
WellbornCC,SturmPF,孵化RS,BomzeSR,JablonskiK.我ntraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of cervical spine measurements.J Pediatr Orthop.2000;20(1):66–70.
LiH,LouJ,LiuH,WangB.Effect of intervertebral disc height on the range of motion and clinical outcomes after single-level implantation of Prestige LP cervical disc prosthesis.Clin Neurol Neurosurg.2016;148:1–4.
WangX,LiuH,MengY,et al.Effect of disc height and degree of distraction on heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement.World Neurosurg.2021;145:e100–e107.
YangX,BartelsRHMA,DonkR,et al.Does heterotopic ossification in cervical arthroplasty affect clinical outcome?World Neurosurg.2019;131:e408–e414.
ZhouHH,QuY,DongRP,KangMY,ZhaoJW.Does heterotopic ossification affect the outcomes of cervical total disc replacement? A meta-analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2015;40(6):E332–E340.
ColmanMW,ZavrasAG,FedericoVP,et al.Longitudinal assessment of segmental motion of the cervical spine following total disc arthroplasty: a comparative analysis of devices.J Neurosurg Spine.2022;37(4):556–562.
PhamM,PhanK,Teng我,MobbsRJ.Comparative study between M6-C and Mobi-C cervical artificial disc replacement: biomechanical outcomes and comparison with normative data.Orthop Surg.2018;10(2):84–88.
PatwardhanAG,HaveyRM.Prosthesis design influences segmental contribution to total cervical motion after cervical disc arthroplasty.Eur Spine J.2020;29(11):2713–2721.
AbudouainiH,LiuH,HuangC,et al.Effect of changes in postoperative intervertebral space height on clinical and radiological outcomes after cervical disc replacement.World Neurosurg.2021;145:e61–e67.
RihnJA,RadcliffK,HippJ,et al.Radiographic variables that may predict clinical outcomes in cervical disk replacement surgery.J Spinal Disord Tech.2015;28(3):106–113.
KautherMD,PiotrowskiM,HussmannB,LendemansS,WedemeyerC.Cervical range of motion and strength in 4,293 young male adults with chronic neck pain.Eur Spine J.2012;21(8):1522–1527.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 380 | 380 | 102 |
Full Text Views | 44 | 44 | 11 |
PDF Downloads | 55 | 55 | 15 |
EPUB Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |