This site usescookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Search Results

You are looking at1-1of1items for

  • Author or Editor: Emily L. Geislerx
  • Refine by Access: allx
Clear All Modify Search
Restricted access

伊姆兰Rizvi Rami r . Hallac,艾米丽·l·聊聊,杰米na K. Perez, Bar Y. Ainuz, Mark P. Pressler, Sarah A. Jackson, Gary B. Skolnick, Matthew D. Smyth, James R. Seaward, Christopher A. Derderian, Lisa R. David, Christopher M. Runyan, Kamlesh B. Patel, and Alex A. Kane

OBJECTIVE

A literature gap exists comparing whole head shape outcome following correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. The objective of this multicenter study was to provide an analysis of long-term results following three different endoscopic strip craniectomy techniques for correction of sagittal craniosynostosis: 1) spring-assisted strip craniectomy, 2) wide-strip craniectomy with biparietal and bitemporal barrel-stave wedge osteotomies plus helmet orthosis, and 3) narrow-strip craniectomy plus orthosis without barrel staves.

开云体育世界杯赔率

Pre- and postoperative 3D stereophotogrammetric images were collected from patients who underwent craniosynostosis surgery. Procedures were divided among institutions as follows: spring-assisted strip craniectomies were performed at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Hospital; narrow-strip craniectomies were performed at St. Louis Children’s Hospital by one craniofacial surgeon; and wide-vertex craniectomies were performed at St. Louis Children’s Hospital prior to 2010, and then continued at Children’s Medical Center Dallas. Pre- and postoperative 3D whole-head composite images were generated for each procedure to visually represent outcomes at final follow-up and compared with age-matched normal controls.

RESULTS

Patients in the spring-assisted strip craniectomy group showed normalization of frontal bossing and skull height compared with age-matched controls, whereas patients undergoing wide-strip craniectomy showed greater correction of occipital protrusion. Patients in the narrow-strip craniectomy cohort had intermediate results between these outcomes. Nested aggregate head shapes showed good correction of head shapes from all techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

This large, retrospective, multicenter study illustrated whole head shape outcomes from three different craniectomy procedures. Although each procedure showed some differences in loci of primary correction, all three surgical methods demonstrated good correction of primary scaphocephalic deformity.

Baidu
map