This site usescookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Search Results

You are looking at1-2of2items for

  • Author or Editor: M. Zubair Tahirx
  • Refine by Access: allx
Clear All Modify Search
Restricted access

Julia D. Sharma, Kiran K. Seunarine, Muhammad Zubair Tahir, and Martin M. Tisdall

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of optical frameless neuronavigation (ON) and robot-assisted (RA) stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrode placement in children, and to identify factors that might increase the risk of misplacement.

开云体育世界杯赔率

The authors undertook a retrospective review of all children who underwent SEEG at their institution. Twenty children were identified who underwent stereotactic placement of a total of 218 electrodes. Six procedures were performed using ON and 14 were placed using a robotic assistant. Placement error was calculated at cortical entry and at the target by calculating the Euclidean distance between the electrode and the planned cortical entry and target points. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the results for ON and RA placement accuracy. For each electrode placed using robotic assistance, extracranial soft-tissue thickness, bone thickness, and intracranial length were measured. Entry angle of electrode to bone was calculated using stereotactic coordinates. A stepwise linear regression model was used to test for variables that significantly influenced placement error.

RESULTS

Between 8 and 17 electrodes (median 10 electrodes) were placed per patient. Median target point localization error was 4.5 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 2.8–6.1 mm) for ON and 1.07 mm (IQR 0.71–1.59) for RA placement. Median entry point localization error was 5.5 mm (IQR 4.0–6.4) for ON and 0.71 mm (IQR 0.47–1.03) for RA placement. The difference in accuracy between Stealth-guided (ON) and RA placement was highly significant for both cortical entry point and target (p < 0.0001 for both). Increased soft-tissue thickness and intracranial length reduced accuracy at the target. Increased soft-tissue thickness, bone thickness, and younger age reduced accuracy at entry. There were no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

RA stereotactic electrode placement is highly accurate and is significantly more accurate than ON. Larger safety margins away from vascular structures should be used when placing deep electrodes in young children and for trajectories that pass through thicker soft tissues such as the temporal region.

Restricted access

Keng Siang Lee, Kiran K. Seunarine, Nicola Barnes, M. Zubair Tahir, Sophia M. Varadkar, and Martin M. Tisdall

OBJECTIVE

Robot-assisted (RA) stereotactic MRI–guided laser ablation has been reported to be a safe and effective technique for the treatment of epileptogenic foci in children and adults. In this study the authors aimed to assess the accuracy of RA stereotactic MRI–guided laser fiber placement in children and to identify factors that might increase the risk of misplacement.

开云体育世界杯赔率

回顾所有c的单一机构审查hildren from 2019 to 2022 who underwent RA stereotactic MRI–guided laser ablation for epilepsy was undertaken. Placement error was calculated at the target by measuring the Euclidean distance between the implanted laser fiber position and the preoperatively planned position. Collected data included age at surgery, sex, pathology, date of robot calibration, number of catheters, entry position, entry angle, extracranial soft-tissue thickness, bone thickness, and intracranial catheter length. A systematic review of the literature was also performed using Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

RESULTS

在28癫痫患儿中,作者评估35 RA stereotactic MRI–guided laser ablation fiber placements. Twenty (71.4%) children had undergone ablation for hypothalamic hamartoma, 7 children (25.0%) for presumed insular focal cortical dysplasia, and 1 patient (3.6%) for periventricular nodular heterotopia. Nineteen children were male (67.9.%) and 9 were female (32.1%). The median age at the time of the procedure was 7.67 years (IQR 4.58–12.26 years). The median target point localization error (TPLE) was 1.27 mm (IQR 0.76–1.71 mm). The median offset error between the planned and actual trajectories was 1.04° (IQR 0.73°–1.46°). Patient age, sex, pathology and the time interval between date of surgery and robot calibration, entry position, entry angle, soft-tissue thickness, bone thickness, and intracranial length were not associated with the placement accuracy of the implanted laser fibers. However, the number of catheters placed did correlate with the offset angle error on univariate analysis (ρ = 0.387, p = 0.022). There were no immediate surgical complications. Meta-analysis indicated that the overall pooled mean TPLE was 1.46 mm (95% CI −0.58 to 3.49 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

RA stereotactic MRI–guided laser ablation for epilepsy in children is highly accurate. These data will aid surgical planning.

Baidu
map