This site usescookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Search Results

You are looking at1-3of3items for

  • Author or Editor: Yusuf Mehkrix
  • Refine by Access: allx
Clear All Modify Search
Restricted access

Yusuf Mehkri, Ramy Sharaf, Sophie Liu, Moshe Shalom, and Julian Gendreau

Restricted access

Julian Gendreau, Cathleen C. Kuo, Yusuf Mehkri, Sachiv Chakravarti, Brian Lu, Daniel Lubelski, Kristin J. Redmond, Chetan Bettegowda, and Debraj Mukherjee

OBJECTIVE

Chordomas are most frequently found in the sacrum, vertebral column, and skull base. Achieving gross-total resection (GTR) has been shown to optimize overall survival (OS); however, the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) for patients with GTR is currently not well understood. Given that RT may negatively impact patient quality of life, the aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of RT for improving OS in patients who have undergone GTR of spinal chordoma through analysis of the national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

开云体育世界杯赔率

SEER数据库(1975 - 2018)查询adult patients (≥ 21 years) who underwent GTR for spinal chordoma. Bivariate analysis was conducted using chi-square testing for categorical variables, and the log-rank test was performed to find the associations of clinical variables with OS. Cox proportional hazards models were generated for multivariate analyses of the associations among clinical variables and OS.

RESULTS

一个总of 263 spinal chordomas that underwent GTR were identified. The mean age of all included patients was 58.72 years, and 63.9% of patients were male. In addition, 0.4% had dedifferentiated histology. The mean follow-up was 75.54 months. Of all patients, 152 (57.8%) received no RT and 111 (42.2%) received RT. Patients with sacral tumor location (80.9% vs 51.4%, p < 0.001) were more likely not to undergo RT when compared to patients with vertebral column location. In multivariate analysis, only age ≥ 65 years was associated with poorer OS (HR 3.16, CI 1.54–5.61, p < 0.001). RT did not have a statistically significant association with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

RT after GTR of chordoma did not improve OS among SEER chordoma patients to a value that achieved statistical significance. Additional multicenter prospective studies are needed to determine the true efficacy of RT after GTR of spinal chordoma.

Restricted access

Ken Porche, Sandra C. Yan, Yusuf Mehkri, Sai Sriram, Andrew MacNeil, Kaitlyn Melnick, Cynthia Garvan, Sasha Vaziri, Christoph Seubert, Gregory Murad, Matthew Decker, Adam Polifka, Daniel J. Hoh, and Basma Mohamed

OBJECTIVE

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is a comprehensive, multifaceted approach aimed at improving postoperative outcomes. It incorporates a range of strategies to promote early and more effective recovery, including reducing pain, complications, and length of stay, without increasing readmission rate. To date, ERAS for spine surgery patients has been primarily limited to lumbar surgery and anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). ERAS has not been previously studied for posterior cervical surgery, which may present a greater opportunity for improvement in patient outcomes with ERAS than ACDF. This single-institution, multi-surgeon study assessed the impact of an ERAS protocol in patients undergoing posterior cervical decompression surgery.

开云体育世界杯赔率

This study included a retrospective consecutive patient cohort with controls that were propensity matched for age, body mass index, sex, home opioid use, surgical levels, Nurick grade, and smoking status. In addition, consecutive patients who underwent posterior cervical decompression surgery for degenerative disease from December 2014 to December 2021 were included. ERAS was implemented in December 2018. Demographic, perioperative, clinical, and radiographic information was gathered. Regression models were created to evaluate length of stay, physiological function, pain levels, and opioid use. The primary focus was length of stay, with secondary outcomes including timing of ambulation, bowel movement, and voiding; daily pain scores; opioid consumption; discharge status; 30-day readmission rates; and reoperation rates.

RESULTS

There were 366 patients included in the study, all of whom were included in multivariate models, and 254 (127 in each cohort) were included on the basis of matching. After propensity matching, patient characteristics, operative procedures, and operative duration were similar between groups. The ERAS cohort had a significantly improved length of stay (3.2 vs 4.7 days, p < 0.0001) and home discharge rate (80% vs 50%, p < 0.001) without an increase in readmission rate. The ERAS cohort had an earlier day of the first ambulation (p = 0.003), bowel movement (p = 0.014), and voiding (p = 0.001). ERAS demonstrated a significantly lower composite complication rate (1.1 vs 1.8, p < 0.0001). ERAS resulted in better maximum pain scores (p = 0.043) and trended toward improved mean pain scores (p = 0.072), although total opioid use was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing a novel ERAS protocol significantly improved length of stay, return of physiological function, home discharge, complications, and maximum pain score after posterior cervical surgery.

Baidu
map