This site usescookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Search Results

You are looking at1-10of367items for:

  • artificial cervical discx
  • Refine by Access: allx
Clear All
Full access

Mario J. Cardoso and Michael K. Rosner

technique, and our experience with 10 patients receiving a contiguous Prestige ST implant. We present contiguous multilevelcervicalarthroplasty as an alternative to multilevel arthrodesis. Methods After institutional review board approval was obtained, a retrospective review of all contiguous multilevelcervicaldiscarthroplasties with the Prestige STartificialdiscbetween August 2007 and November 2009 at a single institution by a single surgeon (senior author M.R.) was completed. Clinical criteria included patients that had undergone a multilevelcervicaldisc

Restricted access

Lennart Viezens, Christian Schaefer, Jörg Beyerlein, Roland Thietje, and Nils Hansen-Algenstaedt

T he replacement of thecervicalintervertebraldiscbyartificialimplants is becoming a generally applied method in DDD. 5 This relatively new method is competing with the gold standard of the ACDF. 10 Both procedures are used in patients with pain and/or neurological symptoms from DDD when nonsurgical treatment has failed. Several earlier studies demonstrated similar clinical results for the new method compared with the gold standard. 9 , 13 Recent studies show an improved outcome for patients who underwent CTDR. 8 However, long-term follow

Free access

Jasmine A. T. DiCesare, Alexander M. Tucker, Irene Say, Kunal Patel, Todd H. Lanman, Frank J. Coufal, Justin Millard, Jeffrey E. Deckey, Siddharth Shetgeri, and Duncan Q. McBride

(NuVasive) 2012, 1-level (C3–7) 2-piece, cobalt chrome endplates, central polyethylene core Semi-constrained 5.2° * See Nunley et al. (2018), 13 Choi et al. (2019), 14 Sasso et al. (2008), 15 Vaccaro et al. (2018), 16 Leven et al. (2017), 17 and Phillips et al. (2015). 18 Despite the widespread adoption of arthroplasty by spine surgeons, the first FDA-approvedcervicalartificialdisc, the PRESTIGE STdisc(Medtronic Inc.), was only approved in 2007. Few studies have examined long-term outcomes; however, two randomized clinical trials have reported lower failure

Restricted access

Yoshihisa Kotani, Bryan W. Cunningham, Kuniyoshi Abumi, Anton E. Dmitriev, Manabu Ito, Niabin Hu, Yasuo Shikinami, Paul C. McAfee, and Akio Minami

R ecentartificialdisc技术迅速发展d and provided great potential for changing treatment strategies for several spinal disorders. 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19–26, 39, 40, 44 Specifically, in thecervicalspine, great attention has been focused on adjacent-segment disease after anterior and posterior arthrodesis. 18, 30 Although patients who present with neural compressive lesions causing radiculopathy or myelopathy often require anterior decompressive surgeries, anterior arthrodesis has generally been an unavoidable procedure

Full access

Neil R. Crawford, Jeffery D. Arnett, Joshua A. Butters, Lisa A. Ferrara, Nikhil Kulkarni, Vijay K. Goel, and Neil Duggal

arthroplasty device to resist loss of lordosis even in the case of poor surgical technique. A second-generationcervicalPCA device (SynergyDisc[ Fig. 1 ]; SynergyDiscReplacement, Inc.) has been developed that is intended to maintaincervicalkinematics while also controlling segmental posture. Various methods have been described previously for experimentally assessing the kinematics ofcervicalartificialdiscs, including measurement of range of motion, axis of rotation, and other parameters. 1–3 , 8 The PCA device has been tested using such methods, and compares

Free access

Domagoj Coric, Richard D. Guyer, Hyun Bae, Pierce D. Nunley, K. Brandon Strenge, John H. Peloza, Margaret O. Boltes, and Donna D. Ohnmeiss

one-level symptomaticcervicaldegenerativediscdisease (DDD) . Accessed February 17, 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04469231 29 McAfee PC , Cunningham BW , Devine J , Williams E , Yu-Yahiro J . Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) inartificialdiskreplacement . J Spinal Disord Tech . 2003 ; 16 ( 4 ): 384 – 389 . 12902954 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00010 30 Walraevens J , Liu B , Meersschaert J , Qualitative and quantitative assessment of degeneration ofcervicalintervertebraldiscsand facet joints

Restricted access

Chao-Jui Chang, Yuan-Fu Liu, Yu-Meng Hsiao, Yi-Hung Huang, Keng-Chang Liu, Ruey-Mo Lin, and Cheng-Li Lin

than with a posterior approach plus instrumentation. 6 , 7 The anterior surgical approach includes anteriorcervicalcorpectomy and fusion, anteriorcervicaldiscectomy and fusion (ACDF),cervicalartificialdiscreplacement (c-ADR), and hybrid procedures. 2 ACDF has long been regarded as a relatively safe, effective treatment forcervicalradiculopathy or myelopathy. 8 , 9 Later, c-ADR was developed and has been shown to be an attractive option capable of preserving motion at the surgical segment. 10 Nevertheless, previous studies have revealed that c-ADR is

Restricted access

Ung-Kyu Chang, Daniel H. Kim, Max C. Lee, Rafer Willenberg, Se-Hoon Kim, and Jesse Lim

-segment disease. Severalcervicalartificialdiscswere developed in the 1990s. Currently,artificialdiscscan be categorized based on several criteria, such as articulation, material, design, fixation, and kinematics. 25 With respect to material, two representative types have been developed: metal-on-metal and metal-on-polymer implants (UHMWPE). These twodiscsare different from several viewpoints. The Prestige IIcervicaldisc(Medtronic Sofamor Danek) is a stainless steel, metal-on-metal semiconstrained–bearing surface. The ProDisc-CcervicalDisc(Synthes Spine) is

Restricted access

Crispin Wigfield, Steven Gill, Richard Nelson, Ilana Langdon, Newton Metcalf, and James Robertson

progression of disease that affects some patients. Attempts at creating anartificialintervertebraldischave met with limited success. 2, 5, 11 In most clinical experiences involving such implants, surgeons have treated patients with lumbar disease (Rapp S, unpublished data). In the late 1980s Cummins, et al., 5 tried to maintain motion in thecervicalspine by using a simple ball and socket—type joint. Their technique was problematic, but in the majority of casescervicalvertebral motion was preserved. The authors concluded that further investigation intoartificial

Free access

Reginald J. Davis, Kee D. Kim, Michael S. Hisey, Gregory A. Hoffman, Hyun W. Bae, Steven E. Gaede, Ralph F. Rashbaum, Pierce Dalton Nunley, Daniel L. Peterson, and John K. Stokes

10.1097 / BRS.0b013e31826d60f S52 - S64 2012b 32 Lopez-Espina CGAF , Amirouche F , Havalad V : Multilevelcervicalfusion and its effect ondiscdegeneration and osteophyte formation . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : 972 – 978 , 2006 10.1097/01.brs.0000215205.66437.c3 33 McAfee PC , Cunningham BW , Devine J , Williams E , Yu-Yahiro J : Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) inartificialdiskreplacement . J Spinal Disord Tech 16 : 384 – 389 , 2003 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00010 34 McMahon JS , Waddell JP

Baidu
map