Previous studies have evaluated growth in spinal height immediately following surgical posterior correction of idiopathic scoliosis, yet have not reported on further spinal growth following surgery. The aims of this study were to investigate the characteristics of spinal growth after scoliosis surgery and determine whether they affect spinal alignment.
The study included 91 patients (mean age 13.93 years) who underwent spinal fusion using pedicle screws for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The study population included 70 female and 21 male patients. The height of the spine (HOS), length of the spine (LOS), and spinal alignment parameters were measured on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine the variables that affected HOS gain from growth. The patients were divided into two groups, the growth group and the nongrowth group, according to whether the HOS gain from growth exceeded 1 cm, to analyze the effect of spinal growth on its alignment.
The mean (± SD) HOS gain from growth was 0.88 ± 0.66 (range −0.46 to 3.21) cm, with 40.66% of patients exhibiting growth ≥ 1 cm. This increase was significantly related to young age, male sex, and a small Risser stage (sex: b = −0.532, p < 0.001, male = 1, female = 2; Risser stage: b = −0.185, p < 0.001; age: b = −0.125, p = 0.011; adjusted R2= 0.442). The variation in LOS was similar to that of HOS. Thoracic kyphosis and upper instrumented vertebra–lowest instrumented vertebra Cobb angle were reduced in both groups, with a greater reduction observed in the growth group. Patients with an increase in HOS < 1 cm showed a larger lumbar lordosis and a greater tendency for the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) to shift backward and the pelvic tilt to decrease (anteverted pelvis) than in the growth group.
The spine still has growth potential after corrective fusion surgery for AIS, and 40.66% of the patients in this study continued to vertically grow by 1 cm or more. Unfortunately, the height changes cannot be accurately predicted by currently measured parameters. Changes in the sagittal alignment of the spine may affect the vertical growth increment.
Approaching the debate of laminectomy versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis, the authors leveraged simulation to show how differences between the fusion groups of landmark randomized control trials (RCTs) led to seemingly divergent conclusions, and they offer insights into the design of future RCTs. Lami = laminectomy alone; SLIP = Spinal Laminectomy versus Instrumented Pedicle Screw. See the article in this issue by Meade et al. (pp 696–704). Reprinted with permission, Cleveland Clinic Foundation ©2023. All rights reserved.
INCLUDE WHEN CITINGPublished online March 10, 2023; DOI: 10.3171/2023.2.SPINE221312.
Zhipeng Deng and Liang Wang contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.
DisclosuresThe authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
ChengJC,CasteleinRM,ChuWC,et al.Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Nat Rev Dis Primers.2015;1:15030.
van PoptaD,StephensonJ,VermaR.Change in spinal height following correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Spine J.2016;16(2):199–203.
LanglaisT,VerdunS,CompagnonR,et al.Prediction of clinical height gain from surgical posterior correction of idiopathic scoliosis.J Neurosurg Spine.2020;33(4):507–512.
KeongKM,AzizI,YinWei CC.Prediction of height increment using preoperative radiological parameters following selective thoracic fusion with alternate-level pedicle screw construct in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong).2017;25(1):2309499016684431.
HwangSW,SamdaniAF,LonnerBS,et al.A multicenter analysis of factors associated with change in height after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis deformity surgery in 447 patients.J Neurosurg Spine.2013;18(3):298–302.
ShiB,MaoS,XuL,et al.Factors favoring regain of the lost vertical spinal height through posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Sci Rep.2016;6:29115.
SmorgickY,TamirE,MirovskyY,RabauO,LindnerD,AneksteinY.Height gain prediction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on preoperative parameters.J Pediatr Orthop.2021;41(8):502–506.
IkwuezunmaI,WangK,RaymondS,et al.Height gain after spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: which model fits best?.J Pediatr Orthop.2022;42(9):457–461.
PapinP,LabelleH,DelormeS,AubinCE,de GuiseJA,DansereauJ.Long-term three-dimensional changes of the spine after posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Eur Spine J.1999;8(1):16–21.
SpencerHT,GoldME,KarlinLI,HedequistDJ,HreskoMT.Gain in spinal height from surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis.中华骨科杂志.2014;96(1):59–65.
ShuS,GuQ,ZhangT,et al.Skeletal growth velocity of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: abnormal in spine but normal in lower limbs.Ann Transl Med.2020;8(6):359.
YlikoskiM.Height of girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Eur Spine J.2003;12(3):288–291.
Siu King CheungC,Tak Keung LeeW,Kit TseY,et al.异常peri-pubertal人体测量and growth pattern in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a study of 598 patients.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2003;28(18):2152–2157.
YimAP,YeungHY,HungVW,et al.Abnormal skeletal growth patterns in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—a longitudinal study until skeletal maturity.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2012;37(18):E1148–E1154.
SandersJO,BrowneRH,CooneyTE,FinegoldDN,McConnellSJ,MargrafSA.Correlates of the peak height velocity in girls with idiopathic scoliosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2006;31(20):2289–2295.
WangX,AubinCE,CrandallD,ParentS,LabelleH.Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of pedicle screws for scoliotic spine instrumentation.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2012;37(14):E823–E835.
TaoF,ZhaoY,WuY,et al.The effect of differing spinal fusion instrumentation on the occurrence of postoperative crankshaft phenomenon in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.J Spinal Disord Tech.2010;23(8):e75–e80.
FrischRE,RevelleR.The height and weight of adolescent boys and girls at the time of peak velocity of growth in height and weight: longitudinal data.Hum Biol.1969;41(4):536–559.
Iuliano-BurnsS,MirwaldRL,BaileyDA.Timing and magnitude of peak height velocity and peak tissue velocities for early, average, and late maturing boys and girls.Am J Hum Biol.2001;13(1):1–8.
KimYJ,LenkeLG,ChoSK,BridwellKH,SidesB,BlankeK.Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2004;29(18):2040–2048.
Mac-ThiongJM,RemondinoR,JoncasJ,ParentS,LabelleH.Long-term follow-up after surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using high-density pedicle screw constructs: is 5-year routine visit required?.Eur Spine J.2019;28(6):1296–1300.
MinK,SdzuyC,FarshadM.Posterior correction of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with pedicle screw instrumentation: results of 48 patients with minimal 10-year follow-up.Eur Spine J.2013;22(2):345–354.
YangX,LiuL,SongY,et al.Pre- and postoperative spinopelvic sagittal balance in adolescent patients with Lenke type 5 idiopathic scoliosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2015;40(2):102–108.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 593 | 593 | 45 |
Full Text Views | 333 | 333 | 1 |
PDF Downloads | 202 | 202 | 2 |
EPUB Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |