This site usescookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Predicting postoperative coronal alignment for adult spinal deformity: do lower-extremity factors matter?

Nathan J. Lee Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Nathan J. Lee in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Michael Fields Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Michael Fields in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Fthimnir M. Hassan Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Fthimnir M. Hassan in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MPH
,
Scott L. Zuckerman Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Scott L. Zuckerman in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD, MPH
,
Alex S. Ha Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Alex S. Ha in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Joseph M. Lombardi Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Joseph M. Lombardi in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Zeeshan M. Sardar Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Zeeshan M. Sardar in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Ronald A. Lehman Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Ronald A. Lehman in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
, and
Lawrence G. Lenke Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, The Och Spine Hospital at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Lawrence G. Lenke in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD$45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD$384.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD$624.00
USD$45.00
USD$384.00
USD$624.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to describe an intraoperative method that accurately predicts postoperative coronal alignment for up to 2 years of follow-up. The authors hypothesized that the intraoperative coronal target for adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery should account for lower-extremity parameters, including pelvic obliquity (PO), leg length discrepancy (LLD), lower-extremity mechanical axis difference (MAD), and asymmetrical knee bending.

开云体育世界杯赔率

Two lines were drawn on intraoperative prone radiographs: the central sacral pelvic line (CSPL) (the line bisecting the sacrum and perpendicular to the line touching the acetabular sourcil of both hips) and the intraoperative central sacral vertical line (iCSVL) (which is drawn relative to CSPL based on the preoperative erect PO). The distance from the C7 spinous process to CSPL (C7-CSPL) and the distance from the C7 spinous process to iCSVL (iCVA) were compared with immediate and 2-year postoperative CVA. To account for LLD and preoperative lower-extremity compensation, patients were categorized into four preoperative groups: type 1, no LLD (< 1 cm) and no lower-extremity compensation; type 2, no LLD with lower-extremity compensation (PO > 1°, asymmetrical knee bending, and MAD > 2°); type 3, LLD and no lower-extremity compensation; and type 4, LLD with lower-extremity compensation (asymmetrical knee bending and MAD > 4°). A retrospective review of a consecutively collected cohort with ASD who underwent minimum 6-level fusion with pelvic fixation was performed for validation.

RESULTS

In total, 108 patients (mean ± SD age 57.7 ± 13.7 years, 14.0 ± 3.9 levels fused) were reviewed. Mean preoperative/2-year postoperative CVA was 5.0 ± 2.0/2.2 ± 1.8 cm. For patients with type 1, both C7-CSPL and iCVA had similar error margins for immediate postoperative CVA (0.5 ± 0.6 vs 0.5 ± 0.6 cm, p = 0.900) and 2-year postoperative CVA (0.3 ± 0.4 vs 0.4 ± 0.5 cm, p = 0.185). For patients with type 2, C7-CSPL was more accurate for immediate postoperative CVA (0.8 ± 1.2 vs 1.7 ± 1.8 cm, p = 0.006) and 2-year postoperative CVA (0.7 ± 1.1 vs 2.1 ± 2.2 cm, p < 0.001). For patients with type 3, iCVA was more accurate for immediate postoperative CVA (0.3 ± 0.4 vs 1.7 ± 0.8 cm, p < 0.001) and 2-year postoperative CVA (0.3 ± 0.2 vs 1.9 ± 0.8 cm, p < 0.001). For patients with type 4, iCVA was more accurate for immediate postoperative CVA (0.6 ± 0.7 vs 3.0 ± 1.3 cm, p < 0.001) and 2-year postoperative CVA (0.5 ± 0.6 vs 3.0 ± 1.6 cm, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This system, which accounted for lower-extremity factors, provided an intraoperative guide to determine both immediate and 2-year postoperative CVA with high accuracy. For patients with type 1 and 2 (no LLD, with or without lower-extremity compensation), C7–intraoperative CSPL accurately predicted postoperative CVA up to 2-year follow-up (mean error 0.5 cm). For patients with type 3 and 4 (LLD, with or without lower-extremity compensation), iCVA accurately predicted postoperative CVA up to 2-year follow-up (mean error 0.4 cm).

ABBREVIATIONS

ASD = adult spinal deformity ; CSPL = central sacral pelvic line ; CSVL = central sacral vertical line ; CVA = coronal vertical axis ; C7-CSPL = distance from the C7 spinous process to CSPL ; iCSVL = intraoperative CSVL ; iCVA = intraoperative distance from C7 spinous process to iCSVL ; LLD = leg length discrepancy ; MAD = mechanical axis difference ; PA = posteroanterior ; PO = pelvic obliquity ; PSIF = posterior spinal instrumented fusion .
  • Collapse
  • Expand
图来自于et al。(238 - 246页)。
  • 1.

    BaoH,YanP,QiuY,LiuZ,ZhuF.Coronal imbalance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: prevalence and influence on surgical decision-making for spinal osteotomy.Bone Joint J.2016;98-B(9):1227-1233.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    ZuckermanSL,LaiCS,ShenY,et al.Incidence and risk factors of iatrogenic coronal malalignment after adult spinal deformity surgery: a single-center experience.J Neurosurg Spine.2022;36(4):585594.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    ZuckermanSL,LaiCS,ShenY,et al.Postoperative coronal malalignment after adult spinal deformity surgery: incidence, risk factors, and impact on 2-year outcomes.Spine Deform.2023;11(1):187196.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    TanakaN,EbataS,OdaK,ObaH,HaroH,OhbaT.Predictors and clinical importance of postoperative coronal malalignment after surgery to correct adult spinal deformity.Clin Spine Surg.2020;33(7):E337E341.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    ZhangJ,WangZ,ChiP.Risk factors for immediate postoperative coronal imbalance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients fused to pelvis.Global Spine J.2021;11(5):649655.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    WalkerCT,GodzikJ,AngelS,GiraldoJP,TurnerJD,UribeJS.Coronal balance with circumferential minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery for the treatment of degenerative scoliosis: are we leaning in the right direction?J Neurosurg Spine.2021;34(6):879887.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    BuellTJ,SmithJS,ShaffreyCI,et al.Multicenter assessment of surgical outcomes in adult spinal deformity patients with severe global coronal malalignment: determination of target coronal realignment threshold.J Neurosurg Spine.2021;34(3):399412.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    PloumisA,SimpsonAK,ChaTD,HerzogJP,WoodKB.冠状脊柱平衡在成人脊柱畸形tients with long spinal fusions: a minimum 2- to 5-year follow-up study.J Spinal Disord Tech.2015;28(9):341347.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    MerrillRK,KimJS,LevenDM,KimJH,ChoSK.Multi-rodconstructs can prevent rod breakage and pseudarthrosis at the lumbosacral junction in adult spinal deformity.Global Spine J.2017;7(6):514520.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    ZuckermanSL,LaiCS,ShenY,et al.Be prepared: preoperative coronal malalignment often leads to more extensive surgery than sagittal malalignment during adult spinal deformity surgery.Neurospine.2021;18(3):570579.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    ChanbourH,HassanFM,ZuckermanSL,et al.Rod fractures after multi-rod constructs in adult spinal deformity patients fused to the sacrum/pelvis: where do they occur and why?Spine Deform.2023;11(2):471479.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    HaAS,TuchmanA,MatthewJ,et al.Intraoperative versus postoperative radiographic coronal balance for adult spinal deformity surgery.Spine Deform.2021;9(4):10771084.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    KurraS,MetkarU,YirenkyiH,TallaricoRA,LavelleWF.Assessment of coronal spinal alignment for adult spine deformity cases after intraoperative T square shaped use.Spine Deform.2018;6(3):267272.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    EscottBG,RaviB,WeathermonAC,et al.EOS low-dose radiography: a reliable and accurate upright assessment of lower-limb lengths.J Bone Joint Surg Am.2013;95(23):e1831e1837.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    ParkKR,LeeJH,KimDS,et al.The comparison of lower extremity length and angle between computed radiography-based teleoroentgenogram and EOS®imaging system.Diagnostics (Basel).2022;12(5):1052.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    SabharwalS,ZhaoC,McKeonJ,MelaghariT,BlacksinM,WenekorC.Reliability analysis for radiographic measurement of limb length discrepancy: full-length standing anteroposterior radiograph versus scanogram.J Pediatr Orthop.2007;27(1):4650.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    AlfuthM,FichterP,KnickerA.Leg length discrepancy: a systematic review on the validity and reliability of clinical assessments and imaging diagnostics used in clinical practice.PLoS One.2021;16(12):e0261457.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    SabharwalS,KumarA.Methods for assessing leg length discrepancy.Clin Orthop Relat Res.2008;466(12):29102922.

  • 19.

    LuoCF.Reference axes for reconstruction of the knee.Knee.2004;11(4):251257.

  • 20.

    PlaisN,BaoH,LafageR,et al.The clinical impact of global coronal malalignment is underestimated in adult patients with thoracolumbar scoliosis.Spine Deform.2020;8(1):105113.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    BuellTJ,SmithJS.Adult spinal deformity and novel classifications: is coronal malalignment making a comeback?: Commentary on "Obeid-Coronal Malalignment Classification Is Age Related and Independently Associated to Personal Reported Outcome Measurement Scores in the Nonfused Spine".Neurospine.2021;18(3):481483.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    ZuckermanSL,CerpaM,LaiCS,LenkeLG.Coronal alignment in adult spinal deformity surgery: definitions, measurements, treatment algorithms, and impact on clinical outcomes.Clin Spine Surg.2022;35(5):196203.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    ZuckermanSL,ChanbourH,HassanFM,et al.Patients with coronal malalignment undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery: does coronal alignment change from immediately postoperative to 2-years?Clin Spine Surg.2023;36(1):E14灯头E21.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    ObeidI,BerjanoP,LamartinaC,ChopinD,BoissièreL,BourghliA.Classification of coronal imbalance in adult scoliosis and spine deformity: a treatment-oriented guideline.Eur Spine J.2019;28(1):94113.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    HayashiK,BoissièreL,CawleyDT,et al.一个新的冠状malalignme分类nt in adult spinal deformity: a validation and the role of lateral bending radiographs.Eur Spine J.2020;29(9):22872294.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    KnutsonGA.Anatomic and functional leg-length inequality: a review and recommendation for clinical decision-making. Part I, anatomic leg-length inequality: prevalence, magnitude, effects and clinical significance.Chiropr Osteopat.2005;13:11.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    HarveyWF,YangM,CookeTD,et al.Association of leg-length inequality with knee osteoarthritis: a cohort study.Ann Intern Med.2010;152(5):287295.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    MoseleyCF.Leg length discrepancy.Orthop Clin North Am.1987;18(4):529535.

  • 29.

    HamadMN,LivshetzI,SoodA,PatettaM,GonzalezMH,AmiroucheFA.Effects of pelvic obliquity and limb position on radiographic leg length discrepancy measurement: a Sawbones model.J Exp Orthop.2022;9(1):71.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    ZuckermanSL,LaiCS,ShenY,et al.Understanding the role of pelvic obliquity and leg length discrepancy in adult spinal deformity patients with coronal malalignment: unlocking the black box.J Neurosurg Spine.2022;37(1):6472.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    RaczkowskiJW,DaniszewskaB,ZolynskiK.Functional scoliosis caused by leg length discrepancy.Arch Med Sci.2010;6(3):393398.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    FerreroE,LiabaudB,ChallierV,et al.Role of pelvic translation and lower-extremity compensation to maintain gravity line position in spinal deformity.J Neurosurg Spine.2016;24(3):436446.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    DieboBG,OrenJH,ChallierV,et al.Global sagittal axis: a step toward full-body assessment of sagittal plane deformity in the human body.J Neurosurg Spine.2016;25(4):494499.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    ShuS,HuZ,BaoH,et al.An analysis of the interactions between the spine, pelvis, and lower limbs in asymptomatic adults with limited pelvic compensation.Quant Imaging Med Surg.2020;10(5):9991007.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    WadeR,YangH,McKennaC,FariaR,GummersonN,WoolacottN.A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system.Eur Spine J.2013;22(2):296304.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 460 460 69
Full Text Views 110 110 32
PDF Downloads 143 143 52
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
Baidu
map