Aneurysmalsubarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality.1,2In addition to rebleeding, hydrocephalus, seizures, and healthcare-associated infections, symptomatic cerebral vasospasm or clinical deterioration caused by delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI; vasospasm/DCI) is a common complication after aSAH, with limited effective therapeutic options.3–5Based on a recent systematic review, established predictors of DCI include large amounts of extravasated blood, poor clinical status on admission, smoking, hyperglycemia, hydrocephalus, diabetes mellitus, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and a history of hypertension.6
Milrinone, a selective phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitor associated with circulatory inotropic support and selective cerebral–vasodilatory effects, has recently emerged in a number of studies as a promising therapy for treating vasospasm/DCI.7–11However, the modality of delivery and dosing differ among centers.12Since 1998, our institution’s protocol for the treatment of symptomatic cerebral vasospasm/DCI has been to administer an intravenous (IV) bolus followed by continuous IV perfusion of milrinone, with increases in dosage according to the patient’s clinical response. The use of this protocol was associated with a lower incidence of both emergency angiograms and salvage angioplasty.13In a recent retrospective French study comparing 1) the use of a combination of intraarterial (IA) milrinone infusion followed by IV milrinone until day 14 after aSAH, and 2) a continuous IV milrinone infusion for at least 7 days after aSAH, the authors reported similar efficacies between the two protocols.14This study reported that 18% (15/77) of patients treated with IV milrinone needed rescue procedures. Although significant, there has been little information reported beyond this study regarding refractory DCI in patients treated with IV milrinone, and their ultimate outcomes following rescue procedures.14To address this knowledge gap, we present our modern-day experience with IV milrinone as standard therapy and further address refractory cases that required endovascular treatment, specifically IA milrinone and/or angioplasty, as rescue therapy.
We report our 6-year experience of both standard therapy and rescue therapy use of milrinone for the treatment of vasospasm/DCI after aSAH, while focusing on patient-related outcomes. We also explored predictors of vasospasm/DCI and refractoriness to standard therapy with IV milrinone treatment.
开云体育世界杯赔率
Study Design and Patient Identification
在这个回顾性队列研究中,我们回顾了我dical records from all patients admitted with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) between April 1, 2010, and March 31, 2016, to our neurological intensive care unit (NICU) at the Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Patients were identified from the intensive care unit (ICU) databases and hospital registry. Inclusion criteria were all patients with aSAH proven by CT scan or CSF analysis, irrespective of timing between initial bleed and ICU admission. We excluded patients 1) admitted with nonaneurysmal, unspecified, or traumatic SAH, 2) who died within 3 days of SAH, or 3) who were treated with IA milrinone before receiving IV milrinone. Patients were then stratified by the presence or absence of DCI. Patients with DCI were further stratified into those who received standard therapy and those with refractory cases requiring rescue therapy.
Patient Management
Details of patient management have been previously published.13,15In summary, all patients were admitted to the NICU. Patients received a standard protocol on admission, which included nimodipine (60 mg/4 hours) orally or via nasogastric tube, regular analgesia (acetaminophen ± antiinflammatory medications), tranexamic acid to prevent ultra-early rebleed (maximum for 72 hours from ictus), antiepileptics (phenytoin) if required, and dexamethasone (2 mg twice daily) as third-line treatment for pain related to meningismus. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography and CT angiography (CTA) were performed upon clinical suspicion of vasospasm. IV and IA milrinone are part of our institution’s therapy protocol for clinical deterioration caused by DCI in addition to maintaining euvolemia, normothermia, electrolyte homeostasis, and baseline blood pressure. The main modification to our previously published protocol13was the option to escalate the dose of IV milrinone up to 2.5 mcg/kg/min.
For refractory cases, the rescue therapy protocol involved emergency angiography and IV or IA milrinone with or without angioplasty for one of the following reasons despite IV milrinone therapy: 1) new decline in neurological status, 2) persistent decline in neurological status, or 3) transiently symptomatic with worsening vasospasm on follow-up imaging.
Collected Variables
Collected variables included: demographics, admission characteristics, preexisting comorbidities, relevant laboratory tests, neurological status at treatment decision graded according to the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) scale, morphological characteristics of SAH and incidence of vasospasm graded according to the modified Fisher scale, aneurysm morphology and treatment method, complications and supportive therapy throughout the ICU stay, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), last documented follow-up after discharge, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score within 18 months after aSAH. The mRS score was extrapolated from information on follow-up assessments by a neurologist (J.T.) certified in mRS scoring and blinded to patient grouping and hospitalization details. Favorable functional outcome was defined as an mRS score of 0–2, and unfavorable functional outcome as an mRS score of 3–6.
Vasospasm/DCI
The detection of vasospasm/DCI was based on repeated neurological examination in the NICU and defined as new or deteriorating neurological signs unattributable to a cause other than DCI, with proven vasoconstriction by CTA, TCD, or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). A new decline in neurological status included changes in level of consciousness or orientation, a decrease in Glasgow Coma Scale score ≥ 2, cranial nerve palsy, pronator drift, or focal motor deficit.5我们还包括新的或deterioratin患者g neurological signs unrelated to a cause other than DCI who immediately responded (i.e., within 1 hour) to the protocol therapy using milrinone and maintaining euvolemia, with or without vasopressors, but who did not have a CTA, TCD, or DSA performed to assess for vasoconstriction because symptoms and signs did not recur.
Neuroradiologists at our institution routinely classify vasospasm detected by DSA or CTA based on the degree of luminal narrowing of the vessel as none, mild (< 25%), moderate (25%–50%), or severe (> 50%).16For TCD, classification is based on the mean middle cerebral artery (MCA) velocity and MCA/internal carotid artery (ICA) mean velocity ratio, and stratified as either mild (> 120 cm/sec and 3–4, respectively), moderate (> 120 cm/sec and 5–6, respectively) or severe (> 180 cm/sec and > 6, respectively).17Severity of initial cerebral vasospasm was based on the reported assessment and retrospectively validated by the independent neuroradiologist blinded to patient grouping and hospitalization details.
Neuroradiological Variables
All available cranial CT and MRI scans after aSAH from before and after discharge were reviewed by the independent neuroradiologist (J.O.J., blinded to patient grouping and hospitalization details) to determine 1) the presence of existing and new cerebral infarcts at admission, 2) new cerebral infarcts before hospital discharge, 3) new cerebral infarcts after hospital discharge, and 4) external ventriculostomy drain (EVD) tract sequela. Infarcts were further stratified into vasospasm- and nonvasospasm-related. Vasospasm-related infarcts were defined as wedge-shaped cortical/subcortical hypodensities within the same vascular territory of the aneurysm, or infarcts located within the same vascular territory showing vasospasm on a previous CTA or DSA.18
For the rescue therapy cohort, angiograms from admission (baseline) and from before and after rescue therapy were evaluated by the independent neuroradiologist (unblinded to treatment) to obtain vessel caliber measurements. For the purpose of this analysis, significant vasospasm was defined as a 50% decrease in vessel caliber compared with baseline measurements.19逆转动脉段血管痉挛的违抗ned as a 50% increase in vessel caliber after rescue procedures compared with prerescue therapy measurements.14
Outcomes
Our primary outcome was cerebral infarction related to DCI, before hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included mRS score within 18 months after SAH, cerebral infarction related to DCI after hospital discharge, reversal of refractory vasospastic segments following rescue therapy, in-hospital mortality, and ICU and hospital LOS.
Statistical Analysis
Analyses were conducted on data from the entire cohort of 322 patients. Collected variables were tabulated for the entire cohort and each patient group (no DCI, standard therapy, and rescue therapy). Patient characteristics and outcomes were summarized using median (interquartile range [IQR]) for continuous variables and frequency (percentage) for dichotomous or categorical variables. Adjustments for multiple testing were made when appropriate.20合适的欺诈单变量测试ttinuous variables, chi-square tests for dichotomous or categorical variables, and Fisher exact tests if the chi-square test conditions were not met. Odds ratios (ORs) or regression coefficients, confidence intervals (CIs), and p values are reported.
预测血管痉挛/ t DCI和耐火材料o IV milrinone were identified separately and compared to the no DCI group using appropriate univariable analyses. Multivariable analyses based on a logistic regression model were conducted for standard or rescue therapy separately, using strong predictors identified in the univariable analyses (p < 0.05). Associations between requiring standard or rescue therapy and the primary and secondary outcomes were investigated with logistic or linear regression models. Complete-case analyses were conducted.
The association between milrinone ceiling dose and severity of radiological vasospasm on DCI presentation categorized into mild, moderate, and severe was studied. The null hypothesis that the average ceiling dose of milrinone is equal across the three levels of severity of radiological vasospasm was tested using a 1-way ANOVA.
We also studied the causal relationship between milrinone ceiling dose and presence of cerebral infarct before hospital discharge and favorable outcome (mRS score 0–2) separately. Because patients were not randomized to receive low or high milrinone ceiling dose, propensity score weighting was performed.21The propensity score represented the probability of receiving a high dose of milrinone (> 1.25 mcg/kg/min). The propensity score model was fitted with a logistic regression. The following predictors were selected based on expert opinion, and included in the propensity score model: age, WFNS grade, modified Fisher score, aneurysm treatment method, EVD, tranexamic acid, smoking status, history of hypertension, and history of cardiac disease. Once the propensity score was calculated, inverse probability of treatment weights was constructed for each patient. We used standardized mean difference to assess the balance of the predictors after applying the weights using a threshold of 0.10. Odds ratios were derived and robust standard errors were calculated. Further methodology, definitions, and statistical analysis details are found in theSupplemental Methods。
Ethical Approval
The McGill University Health Center Research Ethics Board approved this study. The board waived the need for patient consent because the data were derived from medical chart review. The procedures followed were in accordance with institutional guidelines.
Results
Overall Population
Over 6 years, we identified 445 patients admitted to the NICU with spontaneous SAH.Figure 1describes the reasons for exclusion. We analyzed 322 patients with aSAH, of whom 110 (34%) developed vasospasm/DCI (89 received standard therapy and 21 received rescue therapy). The median follow-up duration after discharge was 31 months (IQR 19–52 months). Missing data occurred sporadically, with the highest percentage missing for neuroimaging data.
Flowchart of patients in the study.
Patient characteristics, stratified by no DCI, standard therapy, and rescue therapy groups, are presented inTable 1。中位数时间从aSAH表示承认和读出an time from admission to aneurysm treatment were 1 day (IQR 0–1 day). Fifty-two percent (168/322) of patients were admitted with poor-grade aSAH at treatment decision (WFNS grade III–V). Ten percent (33/322) were transferred to our institution more than 3 days after the initial bleed. IV milrinone was used to treat vasospasm/DCI in 97% (107/110) of cases for a median duration of 12 days (IQR 8–17 days), and vasopressors were used in 40% (44/110) of cases for a median of 4 days (IQR 2–9 days). Among patients with vasospasm/DCI, the detected vasospasm was mild in 36% (39/109), moderate in 27% (29/109), and severe in 36% (39/109). Overall, 62% (68/109) had moderate/severe radiological vasospasm on DCI presentation. Clinical DCI in the absence of neuroimaging was diagnosed in 3% (3/110) of patients. In the group without DCI, 27% (57/212) of patients received IV milrinone for a median duration of 7 days (IQR 5–12 days) for various reasons; the primary reason was a presumptive diagnosis of DCI based on new onset of neurological symptoms and signs that was later proven to be due to other causes such as infection or metabolic derangement.Supplemental Table Ishows milrinone use in all patients over the 6 years.
Patient characteristics
| Vasospasm/DCI Therapy | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | No DCI (n = 212) | Standard (n = 89) | Rescue (n = 21) |
| Demographics | |||
| Median age (IQR), yrs | 57 (49–69) | 54 (48–62) | 52 (49–56) |
| Female, n (%) | 144 (68) | 57 (64) | 15 (71) |
| Current smoker, n (%) | 38 (18) | 16 (18) | 4 (19) |
| Preexisting comorbidities, n (%) | |||
| Hypertension | 83 (39) | 36 (40) | 8 (38) |
| Cardiac disease | 25 (12) | 17 (19) | 2 (10) |
| Diabetes mellitus | 15 (7) | 6 (7) | 0 |
| Admission variable, n (%) | |||
| WFNS grade at treatment decision, III–V | 99 (47) | 60 (67) | 9 (43) |
| Modified Fisher score, 3–4 | 170/211 (81) | 83 (93) | 17 (81) |
| Hydrocephalus | 92/211 (44) | 36 (40) | 11 (52) |
| Presence of old cerebral infarcts | 24/211 (11) | 7 (8) | 0 |
| Presence of new cerebral infarcts | 5/211 (2) | 3 (3) | 3 (14) |
| Glucose ≥7 mmol/L | 109 (51) | 55 (62) | 8 (38) |
| Sodium <135 mmol/L, 0–3 days from aSAH | 46/211 (22) | 17 (19) | 7 (33) |
| Aneurysm location and morphology, n (%) | |||
| ACA rupture | 76 (36) | 39 (44) | 5 (24) |
| ICA rupture | 66 (31) | 29 (33) | 6 (29) |
| MCA rupture | 37 (17) | 15 (17) | 8 (38) |
| Posterior circulation rupture | 33 (16) | 6 (7) | 2 (10) |
| Maximal lumen size ≥7 mm | 86 (41) | 35 (39) | 5 (24) |
| Multiple aneurysms | 34 (16) | 11 (12) | 5 (24) |
| Aneurysm treatment method, n (%) | |||
| Coiling | 144 (68) | 66 (74) | 10 (48) |
| Clipping | 57 (27) | 22 (25) | 11 (52) |
| Unsecured | 11 (5) | 1 (1) | — |
| Vasospasm/DCI characteristics | |||
| Median onset from aSAH (IQR), days | — | 6 (4–8) | 5 (5–8) |
| Mild radiological vasospasm* | 32/153 (21) | 35/88 (40) | 4 (19) |
| Moderate radiological vasospasm* | 15/153 (10) | 24/88 (27) | 5 (24) |
| Severe radiological vasospasm* | 3/153 (2) | 27/88 (31) | 12 (57) |
| Complications and supportive therapies, n (%) | |||
| Rebleed | 23 (11) | 8 (9) | 3 (14) |
| Tranexamic acid | 141 (67) | 64 (72) | 18 (86) |
| Intubation | 97 (46) | 54 (61) | 11 (52) |
| EVD | 114 (54) | 65 (73) | 12 (57) |
| Mannitol | 31 (15) | 29 (33) | 4 (19) |
| 3% saline | 83 (39) | 68 (76) | 15 (71) |
| Sodium, <130 mmol/L | 19/211 (9) | 21 (24) | 6 (29) |
| Potassium, <3.0 mmol/L | 35 (17) | 14 (16) | 4 (19) |
| Phenytoin | 95 (45) | 59 (66) | 10 (48) |
| Milrinone | 57 (27) | 86 (97) | 21 (100) |
| Vasopressors | 37 (17) | 34 (38) | 10 (48) |
| Steroids | 68 (32) | 53 (60) | 12 (57) |
Two hundred sixty-two radiographic assessments on DCI presentation: 117 TCD ultrasonography, 107 CTA/perfusion, 38 DSA. Median duration from aSAH to imaging was 7 days (IQR 5–10 days).
Rescue Procedures for Refractory Vasospasm
Of the 110 patients who had vasospasm/DCI, 21 (19%) required a rescue endovascular procedure within 9 days of starting IV milrinone therapy (Table 2). Indications for rescue therapy despite IV milrinone therapy included: 1) new decline in neurological status (81%, 17/21), 2) persistent decline in neurological status (10%, 2/21), and 3) transiently symptomatic with worsening vasospasm on follow-up CTA during the ICU stay (10%, 2/21). The median IV milrinone dose was 1.25 mcg/kg/min (IQR 1–1.5 mcg/kg/min) prior to rescue therapy and 1.75 mcg/kg/minute (IQR 1.5–2 mcg/kg/min) after rescue therapy.
Rescue therapy patient characteristics
| Patient No. | Age (yrs) | WFNS Grade (at Tx Decision) | Modified Fisher Score | Aneurysm Location | Radiological Vasospasm on DCI Presentation | IV Milrinone Dose Before Rescue Therapy (mcg/kg/min) | Days From SAH to Rescue Therapy | Arterial Segments w/ Significant Vasospasm | IA Milrinone Dose (mg) | No. w/ Successful Reversal of Vasospastic Segments | IV Milrinone Dose After Rescue Therapy (mcg/kg/min) | Sx Resolution 24 Hrs After Rescue Therapy | mRS Score Within 18 Mos of SAH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 69 | III | 4 | ACoA | Severe | 2 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 是的 | 3 |
| 2 | 55 | III | 4 | PCoA | Severe | 1 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | No | 4 |
| 3 | 20 | II | 2 | ACoA | Severe | 0.75 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 1.5 | 是的 | 1 |
| 4 | 35 | II | 3 | ACoA | Severe | 1.25 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1.25 | 是的 | 2 |
| 5 | 56 | I | 4 | MCA | Moderate | 1 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1.5 | 是的 | 4 |
| 6 | 63 | II | 4 | MCA | Severe | 0.5 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1.75 | 是的 | 0 |
| 7 | 49 | V | 3 | PCA | Severe | 1 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 是的 | 3 |
| 8 | 46 | II | 4 | Ophthalmic | Severe | 1.25 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 是的 | 0 |
| 9 | 43 | IV | 3 | Vertebral | Moderate | 0.75 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 2 | No | 3 |
| 10 | 49 | IV | 2 | MCA | Mild | 0.75 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1.25 | No | 2 |
| 11 | 49 | IV | 4 | ACoA | Mild | 2 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 是的 | 1 |
| 12 | 52 | III | 2 | MCA | Moderate | 1.25 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1.75 | 是的 | 2 |
| 13 | 63 | III | 4 | ACoA | Severe | 1.75 | 14 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2.5 | No | 4 |
| 14 | 53 | I | 4 | MCA | Moderate | 1.25 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 是的 | 0 |
| 15 | 50 | I | 3 | Pericallosal | Severe | 1 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 是的 | 1 |
| 16 | 64 | I | 4 | MCA | Severe | 1.5 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 是的 | 0 |
| 17 | 55 | II | 4 | PCoA | Mild | 1.5 | 13 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 1.5 | 是的 | 2 |
| 18 | 56 | II | 4 | MCA | Moderate | 2 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 2 | No | 1 |
| 19 | 46 | I | 4 | Anterior choroidal | Severe | 1.5 | 9 | 9 | 12 | 2 | 2.5 | 是的 | 0 |
| 20 | 49 | I | 1 | PCoA | Mild | 1.5 | 11 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 1.75 | 是的 | 0 |
| 21 | 52 | II | 4 | ACoA | Severe | 1.25 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 是的 | 3 |
ACoA = anterior communicating artery; PCA = posterior cerebral artery; PCoA = posterior communicating artery; Sx = symptom; Tx = treatment.
In this cohort, there were 91 significant arterial vasospastic segments, with a median of 4 arterial segments (IQR 3–5 segments) per patient. The anatomical distribution of vasospastic segments by territory was MCA (n = 37), anterior cerebral artery (ACA; n = 36), ICA (n = 12), and posterior circulation (n = 6). These vasospastic segments required 31 targeted procedures, including 25 IA milrinone infusions (18 ICA, 4 MCA, 2 posterior circulation, and 1 common carotid artery) and 6 mechanical angioplasties (all MCA). Rescue procedures resulted in a significant increase in vessel caliber for 32% (29/91) of the arterial segments, with 12 patients (57%, 12/21) having at least 1 arterial segment reversed after therapy. Of the patients who did not have significant vasospastic segments reversed after therapy (43%, 9/21), 56% (5/9) had neurological improvement within 24 hours (Table 2). Qualitative and objective assessments were performed and are shown inSupplemental Figure I。Overall, 76% (16/21) had significant improvement in their neurological status within 24 hours of initiating therapy. Only 1 patient had angiographically proven vasospasm recurrence in 4 arterial segments after rescue mechanical angioplasty (2 angioplasties were performed during the same session), requiring IA milrinone 6 days later. An additional 5 patients required mechanical angioplasty, 2 of whom underwent angioplasty followed by IA milrinone, and 2 required IA milrinone followed by angioplasty. One patient presented late and was found to have severe stenosis at the origin of the right vertebral artery, requiring angioplasty followed by stent-assisted coiling.
Risk Factors for Refractory Vasospasm/DCI Requiring Rescue Therapy
In patients with vasospasm/DCI, response to standard therapy was significantly associated with higher WFNS grade at treatment decision, higher modified Fisher score, and mild or moderate/severe vasospasm on radiological images, while we found a trend toward better response when the ruptured aneurysm was not located in the posterior circulation (Table 3). Higher WFNS grade at treatment decision as well as mild or moderate/severe vasospasm on radiological images remained significantly associated with requiring standard therapy in the multivariable analysis (Table 4). Moderate/severe vasospasm on radiological images was significantly associated with requiring rescue therapy, while there was a trend toward an association with younger age, presence of new cerebral infarct, the ruptured aneurysm being located in the MCA, and using clipping as the treatment method (Table 3). Only moderate/severe vasospasm on radiological images significantly predicted requiring rescue therapy in the multivariable analysis (Table 4).
Admission predictors for vasospasm/DCI for the entire cohort
| Standard Therapy | Rescue Therapy, n = 21 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | All Patients, n = 322 | No DCI, n = 212 | Standard Therapy, n = 89 | OR | 95% CI | p Value | Rescue Therapy, n = 21 | OR | 95% CI | p Value |
| Demographics | ||||||||||
| Median age (IQR), yrs | 56 (48-56) | 57 (49–69) | 54 (48–62) | 0.98 | 0.96–1.00 | 0.074 | 52 (49–56) | 0.96 | 0.93–0.99 | 0.098 |
| Female, n (%) | 216 (67) | 144 (68) | 57 (64) | 0.84 | 0.50–1.42 | 0.772 | 15 (71) | 1.18 | 0.46–3.43 | 0.924 |
| Current smoker, n (%) | 58 (18) | 38 (18) | 16 (18) | 1 | 0.52–1.88 | 0.991 | 4 (19) | 1.08 | 0.30–3.11 | 0.954 |
| Preexisting comorbidities, n (%) | ||||||||||
| Hypertension | 127 (39) | 83 (39) | 36 (40) | 1.06 | 0.63–1.75 | 0.932 | 8 (38) | 0.96 | 0.36–2.37 | 0.954 |
| Cardiac disease | 44 (14) | 25 (12) | 17 (19) | 1.76 | 0.89–3.44 | 0.211 | 2 (10) | 0.79 | 0.12–2.94 | 0.924 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 21 (7) | 15 (7) | 6 (7) | 0.95 | 0.33–2.42 | 0.944 | 0 | — | — | — |
| Admission variable, n (%) | ||||||||||
| WFNS grade at treatment decision, III–V | 168 (52) | 99 (47) | 60 (67) | 2.36 | 1.42–4.00 | 0.005 | 9 (43) | 0.86 | 0.34–2.11 | 0.924 |
| Modified Fisher score, 3–4 | 270/321 (84) | 170/211 (81) | 83 (93) | 3.34 | 1.46–9.03 | 0.025 | 17 (81) | 1.03 | 0.36–3.71 | 0.966 |
| Hydrocephalus | 139/321 (43) | 92/211 (44) | 36 (40) | 0.88 | 0.53–1.45 | 0.808 | 11 (52) | 1.42 | 0.58–3.55 | 0.827 |
| Presence of old cerebral infarcts | 31/321 (10) | 24/211 (11) | 7 (8) | 0.67 | 0.26–1.53 | 0.596 | 0 | — | — | — |
| Presence of new cerebral infarcts | 11/321 (3) | 5/211 (2) | 3 (3) | 1.44 | 0.29–5.99 | 0.808 | 3 (14) | 6.87 | 1.32–30.4 | 0.079 |
| Glucose ≥7 mmol/L | 172 (53) | 109 (51) | 55 (62) | 1.53 | 0.93–2.55 | 0.211 | 8 (38) | 0.58 | 0.22–1.44 | 0.568 |
| Sodium <135 mmol/L, 0–3 days from aSAH | 70/321 (22) | 46/211 (22) | 17 (19) | 0.85 | 0.45–1.55 | 0.808 | 7 (33) | 1.79 | 0.65–4.58 | 0.568 |
| Aneurysm location & morphology, n (%) | ||||||||||
| ACA rupture | 120 (37) | 76 (36) | 39 (44) | 1.4 | 0.84–2.31 | 0.369 | 5 (24) | 0.56 | 0.18–1.49 | 0.568 |
| ICA rupture | 101 (31) | 66 (31) | 29 (33) | 1.07 | 0.62–1.81 | 0.932 | 6 (29) | 0.88 | 0.30–2.28 | 0.924 |
| MCA rupture | 60 (19) | 37 (17) | 15 (17) | 0.96 | 0.48–1.82 | 0.944 | 8 (38) | 2.91 | 1.08–7.42 | 0.098 |
| Posterior circulation rupture | 41 (13) | 33 (16) | 6 (7) | 0.39 | 0.14 - -0.91 | 0.104 | 2 (10) | 0.57 | 0.09–2.10 | 0.827 |
| Maximal lumen size ≥7 mm | 126 (39) | 86 (41) | 35 (39) | 0.95 | 0.57–1.57 | 0.932 | 5 (24) | 0.46 | 0.15–1.22 | 0.377 |
| Multiple aneurysms | 50 (16) | 34 (16) | 11 (12) | 0.74 | 0.34–1.49 | 0.65 | 5 (24) | 1.64 | 0.51–4.50 | 0.734 |
| Aneurysm treatment method, n (%) | ||||||||||
| Coiling | 220 (68) | 144 (68) | 66 (74) | 1.36 | 0.79–2.39 | 0.51 | 10 (48) | 0.43 | 0.17–1.07 | 0.213 |
| Clipping | 90 (28) | 57 (27) | 22 (25) | 0.89 | 0.50–1.56 | 0.865 | 11 (52) | 2.99 | 1.20–7.55 | 0.097 |
| Unsecured | 12 (4) | 11 (5) | 1 (1) | 0.21 | 0.01–1.09 | 0.27 | 0 | — | — | |
| Vasospasm/DCI characteristics | ||||||||||
| Median onset from SAH (IQR), days | 6 (4–8)* | — | 6 (4–8)† | — | — | — | 5 (5–8)‡ | — | — | — |
| Mild radiological vasospasm, n (%)* | 71/262 (27) | 32/153 (21) | 35/88 (40) | 2.5 | 1.40–4.47 | 0.007 | 4 (19) | 0.89 | 0.24–2.61 | 0.93 |
| Moderate/severe radiological vasospasm, n (%)* | 86/262 (33) | 18/153 (12) | 51/88 (58) | 10.3 | 5.49–20.2 | <0.001 | 17 (81) | 31.9 | 10.5–121 | <0.001 |
Boldface type indicates statistical significance.
One hundred radiographic assessments on DCI presentation.
Sample size = 81.
Sample size = 19.
Multivariable association of predictors with vasospasm/DCI for the entire cohort
| No DCI vs Standard Therapy (n = 240)* | No DCI vs Rescue Therapy (n = 173)† | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | OR | 95% CI | p Value | OR | 95% CI | p Value |
| Age | 1.01 | 0.98–1.04 | 0.435 | 0.99 | 0.95–1.04 | 0.684 |
| Higher WFNS grade at treatment decision | 2.32 | 1.10–4.97 | 0.028 | |||
| Higher modified Fisher score | 2.11 | 0.68–6.98 | 0.203 | |||
| PCA location | 0.73 | 0.19–2.80 | 0.642 | |||
| Mild radiological vasospasm | 69.3 | 18.2–464 | <0.001 | |||
| Moderate/severe radiological vasospasm | 142 | 36.8–961 | <0.001 | 27 | 8.01–112 | <0.001 |
| New cerebral infarct | 1.02 | 0.16–6.17 | 0.987 | |||
| MCA location | 1.51 | 0.40–5.65 | 0.54 | |||
| Treatment method: clipping | 1.01 | 0.27–3.58 | 0.99 | |||
Boldface type indicates statistical significance.
Sixty missing radiological scans and 1 missing modified Fisher score.
Fifty-nine missing radiological scans and 1 missing new cerebral infarct.
Milrinone Ceiling Dose
Ninety-nine patients required standard or rescue therapy, had a record of milrinone ceiling dose, and had a record of severity of vasospasm at DCI presentation. The average dose of milrinone was 1.07 ± 0.47 mcg/kg/min in patients with mild radiological vasospasm, 1.08 ± 0.40 mcg/kg/min in patients with moderate severity, and 1.35 ± 0.54 mcg/kg/min in patients with severe radiological vasospasm. Average doses were significantly different across the three groups (p = 0.026). Results were similar when considering all patients who received milrinone (n = 107), although the association was only close to significant (p = 0.05).
A total of 145 patients had a record of milrinone ceiling dose and complete data on the two studied outcomes. After applying propensity score weighting, all predictors were balanced between patients receiving low versus high milrinone ceiling dose. In this sample, a higher dose of milrinone was associated with higher odds of developing cerebral infarct before hospital discharge (OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.82–3.38) and lower odds of favorable outcomes (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.37–1.55), although neither association reached statistical significance (p = 0.165 and 0.454, respectively).
Complications
Adverse effects of milrinone were uncommon despite IV doses of up to 2.5 mcg/kg/min. Complications in the 164 patients who received milrinone versus the 158 patients who did not receive milrinone (for whom data were available) included: 1) new or worsening arrhythmia in 7% (11/162) versus 9% (14/158); 2) hypokalemia in 13% (21/164) versus 20% (32/157); and 3) pulmonary edema in 6% (10/164) versus 6% (10/158), respectively. No patients required renal dialysis.
Of the 164 patients who received milrinone, hypotension was noted in 15% (25/164) and severe hypotension in 2.4% (4/164). Two patients developed transient myocardial ischemia requiring either withholding milrinone therapy for 5 hours or decreasing the dose of milrinone infusion by half; 1 of the 2 patients had severe aortic stenosis on echocardiography. In the rescue therapy group, none of the rescue procedures resulted in iatrogenic complications. The associations of complications and supportive therapies with requiring standard or rescue therapy are shown inTable 5。
单变量并发症和协会中rtive therapies with vasospasm/DCI for the entire cohort
| Standard Therapy | Rescue Therapy | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | All Patients, n = 322 | No DCI, n = 212 | Standard Therapy, n = 89 | OR | 95% CI | p Value | Rescue Therapy, n = 21 | OR | 95% CI | p Value |
| Rebleed | 34 (11) | 23 (11) | 8 (9) | 0.81 | 0.33–1.82 | 0.808 | 3 (14) | 1.37 | 0.30–4.45 | 0.924 |
| Tranexamic acid | 223 (69) | 141 (67) | 64 (72) | 1.29 | 0.76–2.25 | 0.596 | 18 (86) | 3.02 | 0.98–13.2 | 0.245 |
| Intubation | 162 (50) | 97 (46) | 54 (61) | 1.83 | 1.11–3.05 | 0.052 | 11 (52) | 1.3 | 0.53 - -3.26 | 0.924 |
| EVD | 191 (59) | 114 (54) | 65 (73) | 2.33 | 1.38–4.05 | 0.007 | 12 (57) | 1.15 | 0.47–2.92 | 0.924 |
| Mannitol | 64 (20) | 31 (15) | 29 (33) | 2.82 | 1.57–5.08 | 0.003 | 4 (19) | 1.37 | 0.38 - -4.01 | 0.924 |
| 3% saline | 166 (52) | 83 (39) | 68 (76) | 5.03 | 2.91–8.99 | <0.001 | 15 (71) | 3.89 | 1.51–11.3 | 0.074 |
| Sodium, <130 mmol/L | 46/321 (14) | 19/211 (9) | 21 (24) | 3.12 | 1.58–6.20 | 0.005 | 6 (29) | 4.04 | 1.32–11.3 | 0.077 |
| Potassium, <3.0 mmol/L | 53/321 (17) | 35/211 (17) | 14 (16) | 0.94 | 0.46–1.81 | 0.932 | 4 (19) | 1.18 | 0.33–3.43 | 0.924 |
| Phenytoin | 164 (51) | 95 (45) | 59 (66) | 2.42 | 1.46–4.10 | 0.004 | 10 (48) | 1.12 | 0.45–2.77 | 0.924 |
| Milrinone | 164 (51) | 57 (27) | 86 (97) | 78 | 27.8–326 | <0.001 | 21 (100) | — | — | |
| Vasopressors | 81 (25) | 37 (17) | 34 (38) | 2.92 | 1.68–5.11 | 0.001 | 10 (48) | 4.3 | 1.68–10.9 | 0.033 |
| Steroids | 133 (41) | 68 (32) | 53 (60) | 3.12 | 1.88–5.24 | <0.001 | 12 (57) | 2.82 | 1.14–7.23 | 0.098 |
Data presented as number (%) for the complete data set unless otherwise specified.
Boldface type indicates statistical significance.
Outcomes
Of the 277 patients with neuroimaging before discharge, 40% (112/277) developed new cerebral infarcts, but only 21% (23/112) of these were vasospasm-related (Table 6). Of the infarcts unrelated to vasospasm, 43 were posthemorrhage reabsorption, 40 were procedure-related (22 clipping and 18 coiling), 1 was a thrombotic complication, and 5 had no clear underlying cause. Postdischarge, 11 of 187 patients with available neuroimaging developed new infarcts, of which 2 (1%) were vasospasm-related and were detected 3 and 10 months from aSAH (due to unavailability of the prior image). Of the 9 nonvasospasm-related infarcts, 4 were procedure-related (detected after 3 months either when the prior image was unavailable or inadequate technique that did not allow infarcts to be detected earlier), 2 were secondary to hemorrhage reabsorption, and 3 had no cause determined. Postdischarge neuroimaging was acquired a median of 15 months after aSAH (IQR 9–20 months).
Patient outcomes
| Standard Therapy | Rescue Therapy | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | All Patients | No DCI | Standard Therapy | OR | 95% CI | p Value | Rescue Therapy | OR | 95% CI | p Value |
| 神经学数据,n (%) | ||||||||||
| Vasospasm-related cerebral infarct before hospital discharge | 23/277 (8) | 4/173 (2) | 13/85 (15) | 7.62 | 2.41–24.2 | <0.001 | 6/19 (32) | 19.5 | 4.88–77.9 | <0.001 |
| Nonvasospasm-related cerebral infarcts before hospital discharge | 89/277 (32) | 60/173 (35) | 25/85 (29) | 0.78 | 0.45–1.38 | 0.398 | 4/19 (21) | 0.5 | 0.16–1.58 | 0.239 |
| EVD tract hemorrhage sequala | 102/183 (56) | 56/108 (52) | 40/64 (63) | 1.55 | 0.82–2.91 | 0.175 | 6/11 (55) | 1.11 | 0.32–3.87 | 0.865 |
| Vasospasm-related cerebral infarct 3–12 mos after aSAH | 2/187 (1) | 0 | 1/59 (2) | — | — | — | 1/16 (6) | — | — | — |
| Nonvasospasm-related cerebral infarcts 3–12 mos after SAH | 9/187 (5) | 6/112 (5) | 2/59 (3) | 0.62 | 0.12–3.17 | 0.566 | 1/16 (6) | 1.18 | 0.13–10.5 | 0.883 |
| Outcomes | ||||||||||
| Favorable outcome, mRS score 0–2, n (%) | 204/314 (65) | 129/206 (63) | 61/87 (70) | 1.4 | 0.82–2.40 | 0.221 | 14 (67) | 1.19 | 0.46–3.09 | 0.715 |
| In-hospital mortality, n (%) | 35 (11) | 27 (13) | 8 (9) | 0.68 | 0.29–1.55 | 0.357 | 0 | — | — | — |
| Median ICU LOS (IQR), days | 14 (6–21) | 9 (4–16) | 19 (14–24) | 8.08* | 6.04–10.1 | <0.001 | 22 (20–25) | 11.5* | 7.82–15.2 | <0.001 |
| Median hospital LOS (IQR), days | 22 (11–33) | 16 (8–27) | 26 (20–35) | 4.64* | −5.87 to 15.1 | 0.386 | 33 (25–40) | 20.1* | 1.05–39.1 | 0.039 |
Boldface type indicates statistical significance.
Regression coefficients.
Overall, 65% (204/314) of patients had a favorable functional outcome (mRS score 0–2) assessed at a median of 4 months after aSAH (IQR 2–8 months). There was no difference in functional outcome among the 3 groups (p = 0.512, Fisher’s exact test). On average, patients requiring standard and rescue therapy stayed, respectively, 8 days (95% CI 6–10 days) and 12 days (95% CI 8–15 days) longer in the ICU than patients with no vasospasm, and also had a significantly longer hospital stay. Further results including missing data, neuroradiological data, complications, supportive therapy, and causes of in-hospital mortality are found in theSupplemental Results。
Discussion
We conducted a large single-center retrospective cohort study to assess the efficacy and outcome of treating refractory vasospasm/DCI cases in a homogeneous population of patients with aSAH over a 6-year period. The main findings of our study were: 1) despite 52% of patients being admitted with poor-grade aSAH, only 8% (23/277) developed vasospasm-related cerebral infarcts before hospital discharge, and 65% (204/314) of patients had a favorable functional outcome; 2) moderate/severe vasospasm was significantly associated with the need for rescue therapy; and 3) aggressive use of milrinone is safe.
In our cohort, 34% of patients developed vasospasm/DCI, and of these 19% did not respond to standard therapy with IV milrinone. Of those who were refractory to standard therapy, 76% had significant improvement in their neurological status within 24 hours of initiating treatment with IA milrinone therapy with or without angioplasty, and the functional outcome was favorable in 67% of patients. The outcome in our refractory DCI group treated with rescue therapy was much better than the outcome found in a study by Suwatcharangkoon et al.,22in which DCI was initially treated with a hypertensive agent alone (no milrinone therapy), and refractory DCI was treated with angioplasty. The good outcome in their refractory group was defined as an mRS score of 0–3 at 12 months compared to our definition of 0–2 at 18 months, yet their proportion of patients with good outcome was 38% compared to our 67%. This suggests that milrinone is likely beneficial in both responsive and refractory DCI, when administered intravenously as well as intraarterially, although improvement over time (from 12 to 18 months after the event) may play a role as well.
Among our patients with refractory vasospasm/DCI who underwent neuroimaging before discharge, only 32% developed DCI-associated cerebral infarcts, and the proportion of patients with favorable functional outcome by mRS score was comparable between the aSAH groups with and without DCI. In previous studies, up to 45% of patients with DCI (including refractory and responsive cases) developed delayed strokes that were responsible for severe disabilities.23–25Not only was the number of secondary strokes higher in these patients than in our cohort, their outcome was also worse. Vergouwen et al. in 201126found that of 194 patients with moderate to severe vasospasm, 43% had neurological worsening of any cause, 20% had cerebral infarction, and cerebral infarction contributed to unfavorable outcome by vasospasm-dependent and -independent effects. Milrinone may be the reason for the decrease in delayed strokes and improved outcome observed in our study, because it acts not only as a vasodilator but also as an antiinflammatory agent through the inhibition of phosphodiesterase-3.13The improvement in neurological status in refractory cases was mainly seen within 24 hours of initiating therapy, even though the change in vessel caliber can be seen within minutes (data not shown). This finding is another indication that there may be more than one mechanism of action for milrinone, or that the increase in cerebral perfusion after dilation requires time to reverse the effects of the transient ischemia.
We found that younger age, higher WFNS grade at treatment decision, higher modified Fisher score, location of ruptured aneurysm, and mild and moderate/severe vasospasm on radiological images were all significantly associated with vasospasm/DCI responding to standard therapy. These findings are consistent with those of recent studies,27,28including a study by Lee et al.,29but we did not find associations with smoking, hyperglycemia, hydrocephalus, diabetes mellitus, or a history of hypertension as noted by de Rooij et al. in their systematic review.6The only independent predictor of refractory vasospasm/DCI that we identified in our study was moderate/severe radiological vasospasm on neuroimaging at the time of DCI presentation. This finding was not unexpected, nor was it surprising that the odds of developing new vasospasm-related cerebral infarcts also increased with the severity of the vasospasm/DCI, which fortunately did not translate into worse functional outcome, as mentioned previously.
In our institution’s protocol, we use milrinone quite aggressively to treat DCI (Fig. 2). Our IV dose is much higher than that normally used in cardiology, and higher than the dose used in most centers using milrinone for DCI.30The IA dose (2–12 mg total dose) is commensurate with that used by others, but is always used in our institution in conjunction with a high starting dose of IV milrinone that can be further increased if necessary. In our previous study, the side effects of this regimen were negligible.13In our present study, although high doses of IV milrinone were used, serious complications were uncommon. Moreover, the propensity score analysis found no evidence of a causal relationship between high ceiling doses of IV milrinone and worse outcomes. Therefore, there is little reason to avoid using milrinone in patients with DCI, despite the lack of a randomized controlled trial.
Milrinone protocol. MAP = mean arterial pressure.
This study has several limitations. First, the presented data are retrospective and derived from a single specialized tertiary care center, limiting generalizability. Second, the mRS score used to assess functional outcome was retrospectively calculated from medical records, making it less accurate than directly interviewing the patient. However, the single neurologist who extracted the information was blinded to hospitalization details and patient grouping. Third, it is difficult to know which complications are due to milrinone because SAH itself is a cause of myocardial stunning, signs of myocardial ischemia, pulmonary edema, and arrhythmia. Fourth, the found associations between requiring standard or rescue therapy are not interpreted as causal relationships but rather describe clinical practice and treatment decisions. Therefore, confounding is not an issue. However, the propensity score analysis of milrinone ceiling dose and two outcomes relied on the assumption of no unmeasured confounders. Given the large amount of data collected on patients, we are confident that this assumption is reasonable. Finally, neuroimaging at discharge was only available in 86% (277/322) of the patients included in the analysis.
Conclusions
The aggressive use of milrinone for the treatment of refractory vasospasm/DCI after aSAH remains a promising and effective therapy option. Despite the modest reversal rate of significant vasospasm segments during targeted IA rescue therapy, neurological improvement was evident within 24 hours of initiating therapy. Additionally, the patient-related outcomes in our cohort were very good overall despite the high percentage of patients who presented with poor WFNS grade at treatment decision. A randomized controlled trial would best validate our findings.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the work of Andréane Massicotte, Anne-Sophie Châtillon-Angle, and Cedric Châtillon-Angle for their invaluable role in data extraction.
Disclosures
The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
Author Contributions
Conception and design: Abulhasan, Teitelbaum, Angle. Acquisition of data: Abulhasan, Ortiz Jimenez, Teitelbaum. Analysis and interpretation of data: all authors. Drafting the article: Abulhasan, Ortiz Jimenez, Teitelbaum, Simoneau. Critically revising the article: all authors. Reviewed submitted version of manuscript: all authors. Approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors: Abulhasan. Statistical analysis: Simoneau. Study supervision: Abulhasan.
Supplemental Information
Online-Only Content
与在线补充材料是可用的version of the article.
Supplemental Material.//www.prize-show.com/doi/suppl/10.3171/2020.1.JNS193107。
References
-
1 ↑
GoAS,MozaffarianD,RogerVL,et al.Heart disease and stroke statistics—2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association。Circulation。2014;129(3):e28–e292。
-
3
AbulhasanYB,AlabdulraheemN,SchillerI,et al.Health care-associated infections after subarachnoid hemorrhage。World Neurosurg。2018;115:e393–e403。
-
4
DiringerMN,BleckTP,HemphillJCIII,et al.Critical care management of patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society’s Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference。Neurocrit Care。2011;15(2):211–240。
-
5 ↑
VergouwenMD,VermeulenM,van GijnJ,et al.Definition of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage as an outcome event in clinical trials and observational studies: proposal of a multidisciplinary research group。Stroke。2010;41(10):2391–2395。
-
6 ↑
de RooijNK,RinkelGJ,DankbaarJW,FrijnsCJ。Delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review of clinical, laboratory, and radiological predictors。Stroke。2013;44(1):43–54。
-
7
ArakawaY,KikutaK,HojoM,et al.Milrinone for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: report of seven cases。开云体育app官方网站下载入口。2001;48(4):723–730。
-
8
DumanE,KarakoçF,PinarHU,et al.Higher dose intra-arterial milrinone and intra-arterial combined milrinone-nimodipine infusion as a rescue therapy for refractory cerebral vasospasm。Interv Neuroradiol。2017;23(6):636–643。
-
9
FraticelliAT,CholleyBP,LosserMR,et al.Milrinone for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage。Stroke。2008;39(3):893–898。
-
10
RomeroCM,MoralesD,RecciusA,et al.Milrinone as a rescue therapy for symptomatic refractory cerebral vasospasm in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage。Neurocrit Care。2009;11(2):165–171。
-
11
ShankarJJ,dos SantosMP,Deus-SilvaL,LumC。Angiographic evaluation of the effect of intra-arterial milrinone therapy in patients with vasospasm from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage。Neuroradiology。2011;53(2):123–128。
-
12 ↑
LannesM,ZeilerF,GuichonC,TeitelbaumJ。The use of milrinone in patients with delayed cerebral ischemia following subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review。Can J Neurol Sci。2017;44(2):152–160。
-
13 ↑
LannesM,TeitelbaumJ,del Pilar CortésM,et al.Milrinone and homeostasis to treat cerebral vasospasm associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage: the Montreal Neurological Hospital protocol。Neurocrit Care。2012;16(3):354–362。
-
14 ↑
CrespyT,HeintzelmannM,ChironC,et al.Which protocol for milrinone to treat cerebral vasospasm associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage?J Neurosurg Anesthesiol。2019;31(3):323–329。
-
15 ↑
AbulhasanYB,AlabdulraheemN,SimoneauG,et al.Mortality after spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: causality and validation of a prediction model。World Neurosurg。2018;112:e799–e811。
-
16 ↑
YoonDY,ChoiCS,KimKH,ChoBM。Multidetector-row CT angiography of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: comparison of volume-rendered images and digital subtraction angiography。AJNR Am J Neuroradiol。2006;27(2):370–377。
-
17 ↑
LaoA,SharmaVK,KatzML,AlexandrovAV。Diagnostic criteria for transcranial doppler ultrasound。In:McGahan摩根大通,GoldbergBB, eds.Diagnostic Ultrasound。2nd ed.New York:Informa Healthcare;2008:552–554。
-
18 ↑
NaidechAM,DrescherJ,TamulP,et al.Acute physiological derangement is associated with early radiographic cerebral infarction after subarachnoid haemorrhage。J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry。2006;77(12):1340–1344。
-
19 ↑
ShankarJJ,TanIY,KringsT,et al.CT angiography for evaluation of cerebral vasospasm following acute subarachnoid haemorrhage。Neuroradiology。2012;54(3):197–203。
-
20 ↑
BenjaminiY,HochbergY。Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing。J R Stat Soc B。1995;57(1):289–300。
-
21 ↑
RubinDB。Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to the tobacco litigation。Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol。2001;2(3–4):169–188。
-
22 ↑
SuwatcharangkoonS,De MarchisGM,WitschJ,et al.Medical treatment failure for symptomatic vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage threatens long-term outcome。Stroke。2019;50(7):1696–1702。
-
23
DorschNW。Therapeutic approaches to vasospasm in subarachnoid hemorrhage。Curr Opin Crit Care。2002;8(2):128–133。
-
24
EhlertA,SchmidtC,WölferJ,et al.Molsidomine for the prevention of vasospasm-related delayed ischemic neurological deficits and delayed brain infarction and the improvement of clinical outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a single-center clinical observational study。J Neurosurg。2016;124(1):51–58。
-
25
PlutaRM。Delayed cerebral vasospasm and nitric oxide: review, new hypothesis, and proposed treatment。Pharmacol Ther。2005;105(1):23–56。
-
26 ↑
VergouwenMD,IlodigweD,MacdonaldRL。Cerebral infarction after subarachnoid hemorrhage contributes to poor outcome by vasospasm-dependent and -independent effects。Stroke。2011;42(4):924–929。
-
27 ↑
AldakkanA,MansouriA,JajaBN,et al.Predictors of delayed cerebral ischemia in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with asymptomatic angiographic vasospasm on admission。World Neurosurg。2017;97:199–204。
-
28 ↑
LazaridisC,NavalN。Risk factors and medical management of vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage。Neurosurg Clin N Am。2010;21(2):353–364。
-
29 ↑
LeeH,PerryJJ,EnglishSW,et al.Clinical prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage。J Neurosurg。2018;130(6):1914–1921。
-
30 ↑
ShapiroS。Milrinone in addition to hyperdynamic therapy in the treatment of vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage。ClinicalTrials.gov。https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02712788。Accessed February 4, 2020。
