This site usescookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Erratum. Tethered spinal cord among individuals with myelomeningocele: an analysis of the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry

Mark S. Dias Penn State Hershey Children’s Hospital and Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA

Search for other papers by Mark S. Dias in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
MD
Publication Date:
09 Jun 2023
Page Range:
1
Volume/Issue:
开云体育app苹果版下载
DOI link:
https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.5.PEDS20868a
Please see this related article
Free access

TO THE READERSHIP: An error appeared in the article by Dias et al. (Dias MS, Wang M, Rizk EB, et al. Tethered spinal cord among individuals with myelomeningocele: an analysis of the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry.J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2021;28[1]:21-27).

InFig. 4,Variablecolumn, "Independent ambulator" should have been identified as "Therapeutic ambulator". The corrected figure appears below.

FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Cox比例风险回归分析me to first TCR. Functional motor levels were referenced to upper lumbar rather than to thoracic levels, as subjects with thoracic-level lesions, lacking any significant motor function, would not be able to exhibit motor deterioration.

The article has been corrected online as of June 9, 2023.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
开云体育app苹果版下载

Contributor Notes

INCLUDE WHEN CITINGPublished online June 9, 2023; DOI: 10.3171/2023.5.PEDS20868a.
Page Count:
1

  • Cox proportional hazards regression analysis on time to first TCR. Functional motor levels were referenced to upper lumbar rather than to thoracic levels, as subjects with thoracic-level lesions, lacking any significant motor function, would not be able to exhibit motor deterioration.<\/p><\/caption>"}]}" aria-selected="false" role="option" data-menu-item="list-id-250adc9d-782a-4d58-a3c9-acff47b0297a" class="ListItem ListItem--disableGutters">

    FIG. 4.
    View in gallery
    FIG. 4.

    Cox比例风险回归分析me to first TCR. Functional motor levels were referenced to upper lumbar rather than to thoracic levels, as subjects with thoracic-level lesions, lacking any significant motor function, would not be able to exhibit motor deterioration.

FIG. 4.

Cox比例风险回归分析me to first TCR. Functional motor levels were referenced to upper lumbar rather than to thoracic levels, as subjects with thoracic-level lesions, lacking any significant motor function, would not be able to exhibit motor deterioration.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 198 198 56
PDF Downloads 73 73 16
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
Baidu
map