This site usescookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Survival analysis and prognostic factors in posterior fossa ependymomas in children and adolescents

Marcos Devanir Silva da Costa Departments ofNeurosurgery and

Search for other papers by Marcos Devanir Silva da Costa in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD, PhD
,
Carolina Torres Soares Departments ofNeurosurgery and

Search for other papers by Carolina Torres Soares in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
BSc
,
Patricia Alessandra Dastoli Departments ofNeurosurgery and

Search for other papers by Patricia Alessandra Dastoli in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD, PhD
,
Jardel Mendonça Nicácio Departments ofNeurosurgery and

Search for other papers by Jardel Mendonça Nicácio in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Maria Teresa de Seixas Alves Pathology, Federal University of São Paulo;

Search for other papers by Maria Teresa de Seixas Alves in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD, PhD
,
Michael Jenwei Chen Division of Radiotherapy, Institute of Pediatric Oncology (IOP/GRAACC), São Paulo; and

Search for other papers by Michael Jenwei Chen in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
,
Andrea Maria Cappellano Division of Neuro-Oncology, Institute of Pediatric Oncology (IOP/GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil

Search for other papers by Andrea Maria Cappellano in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD, PhD
,
Nasjla Saba da Silva Division of Neuro-Oncology, Institute of Pediatric Oncology (IOP/GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil

Search for other papers by Nasjla Saba da Silva in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD
, and
Sergio Cavalheiro Departments ofNeurosurgery and
Pathology, Federal University of São Paulo;

Search for other papers by Sergio Cavalheiro in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
MD, PhD
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD$45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD$525.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD$624.00
USD$45.00
USD$525.00
USD$624.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the authors aimed to analyze the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients younger than 18 years of age who were diagnosed with posterior fossa ependymomas, and to identify prognostic factors such as the degree of resection, tumor topography, and involvement of the lesion in the hindbrain.

开云体育世界杯赔率

The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of patients younger than 18 years of age, treated beginning in 2000, with a diagnosis of posterior fossa ependymoma. Ependymomas were separated into three groups: tumors restricted to the fourth ventricle, tumors inside the fourth ventricle and exiting from the foramen of Luschka, and tumors inside the fourth ventricle and completely surrounding the hindbrain. Furthermore, the tumors were classified by molecular group using the staining method for H3K27me3. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of 1693 patients who underwent surgical treatment between January 2000 and May 2021, 55 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included. The median age at diagnosis was 2.98 years. The median OS was 44 months, and the survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 92.5%, 49.1%, and 38.3%, respectively. The cases were assigned to two posterior fossa ependymoma molecular groups: 35 (63.6%) cases to group A and 8 (14.5%) to group B. The median ages in groups A and B were 2.94 and 2.85 years and the median OS values were 44 and 38 months, respectively (p = 0.9245). Statistical analysis was performed on multiple variables, including age, sex, histological grade, Ki-67 expression, tumor volume, extent of resection, and adjuvant therapies. The median PFS of patients with dorsal-only involvement was 28 months; for dorsolateral involvement, it was 15 months; and for total involvement, it was 9.5 months (p = 0.0464). No statistically significant difference was found for OS. There was a statistically significant difference between the proportion of patients in whom gross-total resection was achieved in the dorsal-only involvement group (73.1%, 19/26) and those in the total involvement group (0%, 0/6) (p = 0.0019).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that the extent of resection has an impact on OS and PFS. The authors found that adjuvant radiotherapy resulted in a higher OS but did not prevent progression, that the pattern of involvement of the brainstem in the tumor at diagnosis could elicit important information regarding the patient’s prognosis regarding PFS, and that the total involvement of the rhombencephalon impaired the gross-total resection of these tumors.

ABBREVIATIONS

GTR = gross-total resection ; OS = overall survival ; PFA = posterior fossa ependymoma group A ; PFB = posterior fossa ependymoma group B ; PFS = progression-free survival .
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    MukherjiSK.Pediatric brain tumors.Neuroimaging Clin N Am.2017;27(1):xiii.

  • 2

    de RoblesP,FiestKM,FrolkisAD,et al.全球发病率和前valence of primary brain tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuro Oncol.2015;17(6):776783.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Barnholtz-SloanJS,OstromQT,CoteD.Epidemiology of brain tumors.Neurol Clin.2018;36(3):395419.

  • 4

    LouisDN,PerryA,WesselingP,et al.The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.Neuro Oncol.2021;23(8):12311251.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    NeumannJE,SpohnM,ObrechtD,et al.Molecular characterization of histopathological ependymoma variants.Acta Neuropathol.2020;139(2):305318.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    NagasawaDT,TrangA,ChoyW,et al.Genetic expression profiles of adult and pediatric ependymomas: molecular pathways, prognostic indicators, and therapeutic targets.Clin Neurol Neurosurg.2013;115(4):388399.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    BoopFA,SgourosS.Intracranial ependymoma in children: current status and future trends on diagnosis and management.Childs Nerv Syst.2009;25(10):11631165.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    LesterA,McDonaldKL.Intracranial ependymomas: molecular insights and translation to treatment.Brain Pathol.2020;30(1):312.

  • 9

    JüngerST,MynarekM,WohlersI,et al.Improved risk-stratification for posterior fossa ependymoma of childhood considering clinical, histological and genetic features—a retrospective analysis of the HIT ependymoma trial cohort.Acta Neuropathol Commun.2019;7(1):181.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    SowarK,StraessleJ,DonsonAM,HandlerM,ForemanNK.Predicting which children are at risk for ependymoma relapse.J Neurooncol.2006;78(1):4146.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    PejavarS,PolleyMY,Rosenberg-WohlS,et al.Pediatric intracranial ependymoma: the roles of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy.J Neurooncol.2012;106(2):367375.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    ThompsonYY,RamaswamyV,比赛P,DanielsC,TaylorMD.Posterior fossa ependymoma: current insights.Childs Nerv Syst.2015;31(10):16991706.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    CageTA,ClarkAJ,ArandaD,et al.A systematic review of treatment outcomes in pediatric patients with intracranial ependymomas.J Neurosurg Pediatr.2013;11(6):673681.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    YeciesD,AzadTD,EsparzaR,et al.Long-term supratentorial radiologic effects of surgery and local radiation in children with infratentorial ependymoma.World Neurosurg.2019;122:e1300e1304.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    SreenivasanSA,MadhugiriVS,SasidharanGM,KumarRVR.Measuring glioma volumes: a comparison of linear measurement based formulae with the manual image segmentation technique.J Cancer Res Ther.2016;12(1):161168.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    PanwalkarP,ClarkJ,RamaswamyV,et al.Immunohistochemical analysis of H3K27me3 demonstrates global reduction in group—a childhood posterior fossa ependymoma and is a powerful predictor of outcome.Acta Neuropathol.2017;134(5):705714.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    KresbachC,NeyaziS,SchüllerU.Updates in the classification of ependymal neoplasms: the 2021 WHO Classification and beyond.Brain Pathol.2022;32(4):e13068.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    ThorpN,GandolaL.Management of ependymoma in children, adolescents and young adults.Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol).2019;31(3):162170.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    RamaswamyV,HielscherT,MackSC,et al.Therapeutic impact of cytoreductive surgery and irradiation of posterior fossa ependymoma in the molecular era: a retrospective multicohort analysis.J Clin Oncol.2016;34(21):24682477.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    MaSC,LiCD,AgazziS,JiaW.Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of treatment in pediatric posterior cranial fossa ependymoma.Pediatr Neurosurg.2019;54(2):98107.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    RuangkanchanasetrR,SwangsilpaT,PuataweepongP,et al.Outcome of postoperative radiation therapy for pediatric intracranial ependymoma: a single-institution review.Childs Nerv Syst.2019;35(8):13131321.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    ZapotockyM,BeeraK,AdamskiJ,et al.Survival and functional outcomes of molecularly defined childhood posterior fossa ependymoma: cure at a cost.Cancer.2019;125(11):18671876.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 847 847 115
Full Text Views 102 102 17
PDF Downloads 107 107 13
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
Baidu
map