Tectal plate gliomas are rare, slow-growing tumors of the midbrain that are discovered predominantly in the pediatric population. Because of their indolent nature, treatment mainly consists of observation and management of hydrocephalus. Unfortunately, a subset of tectal gliomas may exhibit tumor enlargement and disease progression. Currently, there are no established guidelines for predicting future progression of tectal gliomas or the need for tumor-directed treatment. In this paper, the authors present a large case series of tectal plate gliomas with the aim of determining early indicators of tumor progression and the need for tumor-directed treatment in a pediatric population, along with providing their experience in treating progressive tumors.
A retrospective chart review of 170 patients diagnosed with tectal plate glioma from a single institution, of whom 67 were pediatric patients (≤ 18 years of age), was performed. Univariate analysis was used to determine statistically significant predictors of symptomatic disease progression requiring eventual tumor-directed therapy.
The median patient age of the full cohort was 24 years (range 0–73 years). Compared with the pediatric population, the adult population had more instances of incidental lesions (p < 0.001) and lower rates of hydrocephalus (50% vs 84%, p < 0.001). Of the pediatric patients who had ≥ 5 years of follow-up (n = 51), 12 (24%) experienced radiological progression and 13 (25%) required treatment for their tumor. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year radiographic progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 98%, 90%, and 86%, respectively. In univariate analysis, lesion involvement of the pons, moderate T1 hypointensity, and moderate contrast enhancement on baseline radiology were significantly associated with worse radiographic PFS. Alternatively, significant predictors of requiring tumor-directed treatment included extraocular eye movement abnormalities at presentation, involvement of the lesion beyond the tectum on baseline radiology, moderate T1 hypointensity, moderate contrast enhancement, and an increase in total lesion size during progression. At the most recent follow-up, 94% of the patients had stable/nonprogressive disease, 2% had progressive disease, and 4% died of tumor progression.
患者演示影像学进展may not necessarily experience clinical/symptomatic progression or require tumor-directed treatment. Certain patient presentation characteristics and baseline radiographic features may be predictive of worse radiographic PFS or the need for future tumor-directed treatment in the pediatric population. Typically, the natural history of these lesions lends to excellent long-term survival, even in patients who experience clinical progression, should appropriate treatment be initiated.
INCLUDE WHEN CITINGPublished online June 16, 2023; DOI: 10.3171/2023.4.PEDS22485.
DisclosuresThe authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
BowersDC,GeorgiadesC,AronsonLJ,et al.Tectal gliomas: natural history of an indolent lesion in pediatric patients.Pediatr Neurosurg.2000;32(1):24–29.
KaufmannA,GerberNU,KandelsD,et al.Management of primary tectal plate low-grade glioma in pediatric patients: results of the multicenter treatment study SIOP-LGG 2004.Neuropediatrics.2018;49(5):314–323.
BaumanMMJ,BhandarkarAR,ZhengCR,et al.Management strategies for pediatric patients with tectal gliomas: a systematic review.Neurosurg Rev.2022;45(2):1031–1039.
GassD,DewireM,ChowL,et al.Pediatric tectal plate gliomas: a review of clinical outcomes, endocrinopathies, and neuropsychological sequelae.J Neurooncol.2015;122(1):169–177.
DağlioğluE,CataltepeO,AkalanN.Tectal gliomas in children: the implications for natural history and management strategy.Pediatr Neurosurg.2003;38(5):223–231.
GuillamoJS,DozF,DelattreJY.Brain stem gliomas.Curr Opin Neurol.2001;14(6):711–715.
LiuAPY,HarreldJH,JacolaLM,et al.Tectal glioma as a distinct diagnostic entity: a comprehensive clinical, imaging, histologic and molecular analysis.Acta Neuropathol Commun.2018;6(1):101.
StarkAM,FritschMJ,ClaviezA,DörnerL,MehdornHM.Management of tectal glioma in childhood.Pediatr Neurol.2005;33(1):33–38.
SquiresLA,AllenJC,AbbottR,EpsteinFJ.Focal tectal tumors: management and prognosis.Neurology.1994;44(5):953–956.
BognarL,TurjmanF,VillanyiE,et al.Tectal plate gliomas. Part II: CT scans and MR imaging of tectal gliomas.Acta Neurochir (Wien).1994;127(1-2):48–54.
GriessenauerCJ,RizkE,MillerJH,et al.Pediatric tectal plate gliomas: clinical and radiological progression, MR imaging characteristics, and management of hydrocephalus.J Neurosurg Pediatr.2014;13(1):13–20.
PoussaintTY,KowalJR,BarnesPD,et al.Tectal tumors of childhood: clinical and imaging follow-up.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.1998;19(5):977–983.
FreemanCR,FarmerJP.Pediatric brain stem gliomas: a review.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.1998;40(2):265–271.
IgboechiC,VaddipartiA,SorensonEP,RozzelleCJ,TubbsRS,LoukasM.Tectal plate gliomas: a review.Childs Nerv Syst.2013;29(10):1827–1833.
JalloGI,Biser-RohrbaughA,FreedD.Brainstem gliomas.Childs Nerv Syst.2004;20(3):143–153.
WellonsJCIII,TubbsRS,BanksJT,et al.Long-term control of hydrocephalus via endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children with tectal plate gliomas.开云体育app官方网站下载入口.2002;51(1):63–68.
MohmeM,FritzscheFS,MendeKC,et al.Tectal gliomas: assessment of malignant progression, clinical management, and quality of life in a supposedly benign neoplasm.Neurosurg Focus.2018;44(6):E15.
JavadpourM,MallucciC.The role of neuroendoscopy in the management of tectal gliomas.Childs Nerv Syst.2004;20(11-12):852–857.
TernierJ,WrayA,PugetS,BodaertN,ZerahM,Sainte-RoseC.Tectal plate lesions in children.J Neurosurg.2006;104(6 suppl):369–376.
GrantGA,AvellinoAM,LoeserJD,EllenbogenRG,BergerMS,RobertsTS.Management of intrinsic gliomas of the tectal plate in children. A ten-year review.Pediatr Neurosurg.1999;31(4):170–176.
MazloomA,HodgesJC,TehBS,ChintagumpalaM,PaulinoAC.Outcome of patients with pilocytic astrocytoma and leptomeningeal dissemination.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2012;84(2):350–354.
LiKW,RoonprapuntC,LawsonHC,et al.Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus associated with tectal gliomas.Neurosurg Focus.2005;18(6A):E2.
El-ShehabyAM,RedaWA,Abdel KarimKM,Emad EldinRM,EseneIN.Gamma Knife radiosurgery for low-grade tectal gliomas.Acta Neurochir (Wien).2015;157(2):247–256.
RaminaR,Coelho NetoM,FernandesYB,BorgesG,HonoratoDC,ArrudaWO.Intrinsic tectal low grade astrocytomas: is surgical removal an alternative treatment? Long-term outcome of eight cases.Arq Neuropsiquiatr.2005;63(1):40–45.
WangC,ZhangJ,LiuA,SunB,ZhaoY.Surgical treatment of primary midbrain gliomas.Surg Neurol.2000;53(1):41–51.
KershenovichA,SilmanZ,de RungsD,KoralK,GarganL,WeprinB.Tectal lesions in children: a long-term follow-up volumetric tumor growth analysis in surgical and nonsurgical cases.Pediatr Neurosurg.2016;51(2):69–78.
MottoleseC,SzathmariA,BeuriatPA,FrappazD,JouvetA,HermierM.Tectal plate tumours. Our experience with a paediatric surgical series.Neurochirurgie.2015;61(2-3):193–200.
WulfovichS,TuckerS,LevyM,CrawfordJR.Novel KRAS mutation in an unusual tectal low-grade glioma.BMJ Case Rep.2021;14(4):e242306.
ChiangJ,LiX,LiuAPY,QaddoumiI,AcharyaS,EllisonDW.Tectal glioma harbors high rates of KRAS G12R and concomitant KRAS and BRAF alterations.Acta Neuropathol.2020;139(3):601–602.
SumiK,ShijoK,IgarashiT,et al.Tectal low-grade glioma with H3 K27M mutation.World Neurosurg.2020;141:91–100.
NagaishiM,NakaeR,FujiiY,et al.Rare clinical presentations of pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma with a high proliferative index: two case reports.Medicine (Baltimore).2020;99(3):e18880.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 588 | 588 | 104 |
Full Text Views | 92 | 92 | 44 |
PDF Downloads | 137 | 137 | 74 |
EPUB Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |